User talk:Dodgerblue777
|
A friendly reminder[edit]
|
Edit summary reminder | |
| Hello. I noticed that your edit to USS Wisconsin (BB-64) did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, -MBK004 20:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC) |
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cleveland Police Department, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://ech.case.edu/ech-cgi/article.pl?id=CPD1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Lapdpolicebadge.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lapdpolicebadge.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:LAPDpolicebadge.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LAPDpolicebadge.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 13:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Dodgerblue.
Sorry to drop you this note. It looks like you have got a few. We all get these when we start out as a new Wikipedian, and are finding our way!
I refer you to Template talk:Infobox Law enforcement agency#Simplicity and readability which raises an issue in part related to your edits to the infobox in California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
While the two templates {{Infobox Government agency}} and {{Infobox Law enforcement agency}} are similar, they are not the same. You need to check the relevant documentation for each template, which can be accessed by clicking on the links in the previous sentence.
More importantly, however, is that it appears that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is NOT a law enforcement agency. Accordingly, the infobox should be reverted back to {{Infobox Government agency}}. If, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation does have a law enforcement "division", and it is suitably notable, and warrants an article in it own right, then the {{Infobox Law enforcement agency}} template could be used in that article (with the parent agency set to California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation).
Cheers. Peet Ern (talk) 23:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
minor edits[edit]
The two out of three edits you just made to Portland Police Bureau are not "minor edits" as you marked them. See Help:Minor edit for clarification.
Also, an edit summary of "minor" is unacceptable. Please give the high-level summary of what you are doing. For this edit I would have written something like "upgrade from Infobox Police Department to Infobox Law enforcement agency; additional history". Otherwise, your edits look great! Thank you. —EncMstr (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Please stop marking edits which add or remove content as "minor". —EncMstr (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Please read template documentation[edit]
Dodgerblue777,
I commend you for changing various deprecated templates to {{Infobox Law enforcement agency}} as you did in Portland Police Bureau, but PLEASE read the relevant documentation first. Unfortunately, your changes to the infobox in Portland Police Bureau were not fully compliant with the parameters for the new infobox. I have fixed the basic problems.
Please continue to replace deprecated infoboxes, but please read the relevant documentation first.
Cheers. Peet Ern (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:SDPD.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:SDPD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sandiegosd.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sandiegosd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sfsd jpg w180h227.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sfsd jpg w180h227.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chicagopd jpg w300h294.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Chicagopd jpg w300h294.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Alamedasd jpg w180h138.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Alamedasd jpg w180h138.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mcsopatch.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Mcsopatch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sbsd w180h138.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Sbsd w180h138.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
REQUESTED CORRECTIONS
Hello, I am writing to ask you make some corrections to our webpage.
1. Please change the 14th Armored Division nickname back to all caps. That is the standard format for Special Unit Designations. 2. There has never been a 15th Armored Division in the US Army. The next division would be the 16th.
Thank you,
The veterans of the 14th Armored Division Association —Preceding unsigned comment added by 14th Armored Division Association (talk • contribs) 17:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
December 2008[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Template:Infobox NBA Player, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 07:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Colors and contrasts[edit]
Hi - the Columbus change looks interesting, but the 3 state templates weren't readable. You might consider running those choices past one of the automatic contrast evaluators (I used one in a template a while back). Tedickey (talk) 21:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Just so that you know, the Good Article review of this article, which you nominated to be reviewed, is on hold and awaiting improvements. You can see some suggesstions about what can be done to improve the article here. Thanks! -Drilnoth (talk) 14:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Peer review limits[edit]
The guidelines for Wikipedia:Peer review ask that editors nominate no more than one article per day (and four total at any one time). While the rules say that two of the three requests you made can be removed, I will let it slide since this is the first time (although if you want to withdraw any, feel free). Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Template:Infobox WNBA Player[edit]
Hello. I think something in Template:Infobox WNBA Player is causing the players' nationality to appear on the first line of their articles as well as in the infobox. See Helen Darling, Becky Hammon, Sandora Irvin for examples. I notice you've been working on this template recently and I don't want to mess with the code. Can you help? Thanks. Station1 (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop removing redlinks arbitrarily[edit]
You have removed a number of redlinks from 32nd Infantry Division (United States) during the past few days. While I appreciate your good faith efforts to clean up the article, please stop. Per redlink guidelines, red links are appropriate when "a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there exists no candidate article, or article section, under any name." Red links should only be avoided if an article "will never be created, including articles that do not comply with Wikipedia's naming conventions." The red links I left in the article were purposeful and indicated articles equivalent in value and notability to similar, existing articles already linked to within the article.
You also joined several paragraphs together, obscuring the distinctive ideas present in each paragraph, reducing the readability of the article.
Lastly, it would also be very helpful if you added comments to the Edit Summary field whenever you make a change. I have reverted all of your recent edits. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 00:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you were one of the users involved in improving the 32nd Infantry Division article. As a Wikipedian who focuses on US Army units, I thought I would lend a hand in improving it as much as possible. If you need anything, please let me know! -Ed!(talk) 23:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
License tagging for File:46 INF DIV SSI.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:46 INF DIV SSI.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I note that there are a couple of citation needed tags on this article, which will cause problems when it is reviewed for GA status. Might I politely suggest that these are addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Gen. Barton[edit]
I have a question about an edit that you made, see: Talk:Raymond O. Barton
Thanks, > Best O Fortuna (talk) 01:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Go Dodgers! First pitch in 50 minutes. Go Kershaw.
Orphaned non-free media (File:Lapdtraffic jpg w180h142.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Lapdtraffic jpg w180h142.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Glider Infantry Regiments[edit]
I noticed you edited 101st Airborne Division article. Several units from the Second World War that served in that division and with the 82nd and other US Army airborne divisions were glider infantry regiments that currently do not have articles. I was wondering if you would be interested in starting those articles? You can find find the insignia for the regiments' infoboxes here [1]. If you need help with references, I'll be happy to help out later in the month. (please answer here) Mrg3105 --121.216.53.87 (talk) 03:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I am not an expert and do not have the time necesary to develop new articles at the moment. I can create them, but I suggest that you go to a member of the United States military history task force in order to get help in developing new articles on this subject Dodgerblue777 (talk) 02:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 48th Armored Division (United States), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ngef.org/tier.asp?bid=122. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
RfD nomination of "Alexander R. Bolling"[edit]
I have nominated "Alexander R. Bolling" (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — The Man in Question (in question) 10:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Dodgerblue777. I recently began the GA review for Baltimore at Talk:Baltimore/GA1. I have left some preliminary comments on that page that I would like to see addressed before I begin a full review of the article. Please let me know if you are still interested in taking this article to GA status. Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 21:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Images[edit]
I nominated File:Williams w.jpg and File:Parker w h .jpg for deletion as copyright violations because the terms & conditions of the LAPD website mention no public domain status. Hekerui (talk) 23:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:NBAPrimaryColor[edit]
Template:NBAPrimaryColor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:NBASecondaryColor[edit]
Template:NBASecondaryColor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
July 2010[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to The Wire. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Oneiros (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
Hello, I see you made a request at WP:FEED a long time ago, but have continued to be active on Wikipedia and made good edits to the encyclopedia. Since you have posted on WP:FEED in the past, I would like to suggest that if you want please try and help out at the page, as we have a massive backlog. It'd be really great if you provided some advice to other, new users on their articles.
To do this, you'll just need to take a look at their article, which they'll post the link to, and maybe see what perhaps can be improved, like adding sections, references or links, much like you would do with any other article, except you are giving feedback rather than making actual edits. After getting some idea of what needs to be improved, you just need to tell them briefly underneath. It's really simple but incredibly useful to new users and their articles, and helps to overall increase the quality of these new articles.
I hope you will at least consider, thanks. Please send me a message if you have any further questions. Thanks a lot! Chevymontecarlo 13:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Goran Visnjic[edit]
Hey! I did a friendly revert, to coin a phrase, of one of your edits to Goran Visnjic. His military service for Yugoslavia was from late 1990 to late 1991, having turned 18 on 9/9/1990, so the statement about the Dissolution was necessarily vague, as iit was a process over a period of years. If you've read any interviews with GV he talks about being trained to do crowd control as a result of the country's tenor in the early days of the dissolution, then when Slovenia pulled away in late 1990 found himself retrained as a special forces paratrooper and sharpshooter, fighting against what he saw as his own countrymen. He later did service in the new Croatian army as well. (It's no accident the guy was once considered as James Bond -- he literally has nearly every skill Bond would have were he real.) Drmargi (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Japanese air groups[edit]
[2] You may already know this, but numbered Imperial Japanese air groups formed on or after 1 November 1942 weren't called "252nd Air Group" or "305th Air Group" as in being a result of sequential numbering. The individual numbers in each air group's name were actually discrete indentifiers with each digit representing separate information. Therefore, a more accurate rendering of their names would be "252 Air Group" or "Air Group 252." We probably need to place hidden messages in the article texts to let readers know that this is the case. Cla68 (talk) 07:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Suns info box[edit]
Was wondering if you could help with a small edit to a season info box here. The bottom of the box has a directional arrow to the preceding and proceeding seasons, however, since the article is that of the inaugural season, there's no season before it. Wondering if you can get that show up deleted or "none" as I've seen in other pages. Thanks in advance... Zepppep34 (talk) 20:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]
 |
Hello, Dodgerblue777! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
--Kumioko (talk) 04:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & DC Meetup 26![edit]
| Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
|---|---|
 |
FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 20:44, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
File:1stDivision.png listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1stDivision.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Neutral notice of an RfC[edit]
A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts# Request for Comment: Pro wrestling. --Tenebrae (talk) 12:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Lapdswat jpg w300h250.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Lapdswat jpg w300h250.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Lasdpatch.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lasdpatch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:27, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Hernandez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scots-Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Bulge order of battle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 15th Field Artillery Regiment and 26th Field Artillery Regiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Detroitpd jpg w300h250.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Detroitpd jpg w300h250.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hisham Tawfiq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ossining, New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chicagopd jpg w300h294.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Chicagopd jpg w300h294.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
745th Tank Battalion and 1st Inf Div[edit]
Hi Dodgerblue777!
Saw you added back in the infobox on the 1st ID to the article on the 745th Tank Battalion that I had deleted a while back. When I deleted it, I mentioned in the Talk section for the article that the 745th was an attachment and not an organic unit to the 1st ID. I also added that if we were to include all attachments and detachments for the 1st ID, the official order of battle published right after the war listed attachments and detachments for the division that ran to 4 pages! Thus, I thought (and think) the infobox is not relevant to the 745th.
Having said all that, I get your point. I think (hope!) I have found a solution that will keep us both happy. I have deleted the infobox again BUT in the summary paragraph I added in that the 745th was attached to the 1st ID for the duration of combat in the ETO, and pointed out that it was unusual for an independent tank bn to be attached to only one unit. Most developed habitual relationships with one division or other, but rarely to the exclusion of any other unit. This was particularly true of armor units, which were assigned to armored groups (The 745th was assigned to the 3rd Armored Group), but almost never fought organically to them; they would usually at most spend a few days back under group control them when they were relieved from the line to refit, perform maintenance, and integrate new replacement personnel. My proposed solution highlights the closeness of the relationship to the 1st ID, but keeps details of the assigned units (which the 745th was not) off the page. Readers are free to link to the article on the 1st ID to see more details of assigned and or attached units.
Full disclosure: my first assignment in the Army was to the 1st Inf Div (Fwd) at Panzer Kaserne in Böblingen, Germany. I was proud to wear the Big Red One, so this is no grudge against the 1st ID.
Hope this is satisfactory. If you still have heartburn let's discuss further and not play ping-pong with that infobox. best regards, Greg Bilhartz (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Dodgerblue777. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Dodgerblue777. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:US regiments sidebar[edit]
Template:US regiments sidebar has been nominated for merging with Template:Military unit sidebar. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 12:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:Patch of the Detroit Police Department.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Patch of the Detroit Police Department.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
[edit]
An article you recently created, 732nd Naval Air Group, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 21:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USS Hornet (CV-8), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidential Unit Citation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello, Dodgerblue777. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:732nd Naval Air Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello, Dodgerblue777. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "732nd Naval Air Group".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:US Armor[edit]
Template:US Armor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:US Corps[edit]
Template:US Corps has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 17[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phina Oruche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igbo.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)