User talk:Dale Arnett/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers approximately the dates between May 19, 2007 and May 12, 2008.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.)

College basketball categories[edit]

Since you seem like a categorization guru, I'd like to ask a quick question. Should Category:Southern Miss Golden Eagles basketball players be Category:Southern Miss Golden Eagles men's basketball players? Thanks, Zagalejo 04:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • No. The school consistently uses "Lady Eagles" for all its women's teams. I'll put a note on the category, if you don't beat me to it. — Dale Arnett 13:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha! Thanks. Zagalejo 19:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Leeds Carnegie logo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Leeds Carnegie logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 22:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea Flag Template[edit]

Hi there,
I've noticed you have been diligently correcting many of the instances of the Korean small flag I've placed in golf articles. First from {{KOR}} to {{KOR2}} and now from {{KOR2}} to {{SKO}}. I'd like to get this right the first time, so you don't have to continually clean up after me! If you have a moment, can you explain the differences among the templates and which should be used in which instances? Thanks very much for all your work. --Crunch 21:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my guide:
  • {{flagicon|KOR}} is OK if you only want to display the South Korean flag.
  • Similarly, {{flagicon|PRK}} is OK if you only want to display the North Korean flag.
  • {{KOR}} will display "Republic of Korea" as the country name for South Korea (although it is piped to the country article at "South Korea". Although that is the official English name of the country, it can easily be confused with the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea", aka North Korea.
  • {{KOR2}} and {{SKO}} will display "South Korea" as the country name. "SKO" is slightly better, at least for the moment, because I noticed that the SKO flag shows up as bordered, while the KOR2 flag does not. I would not be surprised if the KOR2 template eventually disappears.
  • {{PRK}} and {{NKO}}, both for the North, will both display "North Korea" as the country name.
  • In football (soccer) contexts, use the following:
    • In scorelines for international matches, in which the flag is placed next to the country:
      • {{KORf}}, {{PRKf}}, {{KORwf}} and {{PRKwf}} will display the flag to the left of the team link. Use these when the Korean team is at home.
      • {{KORf2}}, {{PRKf2}}, {{KORwf2}} and {{PRKwf2}} will display the flag to the right of the team link. Use these when the Korean team is away.
        • KORf, KORf2 = Display "Korea Republic", piped to "Korea Republic national football team" (official FIFA term for South Korea)
        • KORwf, KORwf2 = Display "Korea Republic", piped to "Korea Republic women's national football team"
        • PRKf, PRKf2 = Display "Korea DPR", piped to "Korea DPR national football team" (official FIFA term for North Korea)
        • PRKwf, PRKf2 = Display "Korea DPR", piped to "Korea DPR women's national football team"
    • For inline references for the two teams, without a flag, use {{nft|Countryname}} for men's teams and {{wnft|Countryname}} for women's teams. "South Korea (women's) national football team" will redirect to the appropriate Korea Republic team article, and the same holds for North Korea vis-a-vis Korea DPR.
Hope I haven't gone overboard! — Dale Arnett 21:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found the holy grail: [1] Interesting page at the least, and will help out the page very much! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Non-free use disputed for Image:Paris_stgermain.png[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Paris_stgermain.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 18:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've just now created a lower-resolution and lower-quality version of the PSG logo and have it on my computer now. I haven't uploaded it yet because I'm concerned my upload will overwrite all the commentary on the existing image page, including the dispute tagging. If I can upload the image without overwriting the dispute tagging, I'll do it, with a fair use rationale. — Dale Arnett 22:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Girondins_bordeaux.png[edit]

I have tagged Image:Girondins_bordeaux.png as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. BigrTex 18:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Artland Dragons can't play in the Euroleague next season[edit]

Even If they win the championship. Only Bamberg or Koln will play in the Euroleague. see Europe Ranking
Please edit Euroleague 2007-08 article. --ArnoldPettybone 00:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OIC. Misunderstood what I saw at the official Euroleague site. Apparently, only Bamberg can secure a Euroleague berth with a league win. — Dale Arnett 02:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Songdis[edit]

TfD nomination of Template:Songdis[edit]

Template:Songdis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – sgeureka tc 11:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:LIOru[edit]

Template:LIOru has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Mike Peel 21:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Boca_Juniors_logo_2006.png[edit]

I have tagged Image:Boca_Juniors_logo_2006.png as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. BigrTex 16:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of songs with personal names: A, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs with personal names: A. Thank you. Corpx 01:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball pages[edit]

When I made the moves, I was pretty certain that I saw that the naming standard for the College basketball WikiProject was to ignore the gender specifics. Now, of course, that I start to look for that same line, I can't find that reference. I'm going to go through and update our master table to reflect all teams that have different names between the men's and women's teams - at that point, I'll revert the specific pages that are affected and leave redirects at the current names. --fuzzy510 23:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On June 29, 2007, a fact from the article Dirk Minniefield, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 09:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you might have a high enough number of DYK contributions, so please consider joining the list of top contributors at Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame. Royalbroil 05:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Centenary[edit]

Awww, you shouldn't have.  :-p

Thanks for the heads-up. --fuzzy510 04:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UNLV move[edit]

Hello My thinking regarding the move was that if the main article is at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, then all subsequent articles should be there, rather than at "UNLV X." It is probably true that the university itself is referred to as "UNLV" more frequently than "University of Nevada, Las Vegas," right? See also United Nations Security Council, not UN Security Council or UNSC. It really makes no sense to have the main article at one name and daughter articles at a different name. As an aside, and reciprocal food for thought, I recommend that you consider archiving your talk page; it's getting pretty long. Thanks for your input, Dale. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Top 500 HR hitters[edit]

Hi, I would like to hear your opinion about this discussion. Thanks, Happy138 10:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PGA Championship match play era[edit]

Hello! I noticed you edited a couple pages and changed the writing in the results timeline. I think it is a good idea, as it does indeed give a better indication of their performance. Do know of a site that already has these finishes listed? I know that 2 --> F, T3 --> SF, and T5 -->QF, but for T9, T17, T33 and so on, instead of writing R16, R32, or R64, could we write the number of the round (as they do in tennis timelines)? For this, we would need to know how many people were in the draw, but I think it would be better to write 1R or 2R instead of the number of players in the round when they lost. Do you know how to find this information? Supertigerman 19:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • My first suggestion would be to look at the PGA of America official site for historic PGA Championship records. They may well have the number of entrants in a given year. — Dale Arnett 19:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Since the worst finish I've seen on timelines is T33, it is logical that that would be a first round loss (1R). T17 would be 2R. T9 I think should be left as R16, because it is highlighted in yellow, and highlighting 3R in yellow seems a bit strange. So here's what I'm doing:
T33 → 1R
T17 → 2R
T9 → R16
T5 → QF
T3 → SF
2 → F
1 → 1

Supertigerman 21:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The field sizes were:

  • 32 for 1916-21, 1924-34, 1942-5
  • 64 for 1922-3, 1935-41, 1946-55
  • 128 for 1956-7

So 1R and 2R will depend on field size, probably better to use R32 and R64 Tewapack 15:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The above referenced article about a school in Kentucky is on my watchlist. I can't find much (anything) on it during a quick search. Do you know of an editor, (yourself?), who might take a look at it? If not, thanks anyway...no reply necessary. --Stormbay 21:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indigenous Australians[edit]

...is the generic name given to both people from the Australian mainland, who are known collectively as Aboriginal people (which is preferred to "Aborigines" these days) and Torres Strait Islanders (who are technically also a "small-a" aboriginal people). (Hence Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Services.) So "Australian Aboriginal " is correct for someone from a mainland cultural grouping. And there is no separate article on them. It's confusing to outsiders, I know. :-) Grant | Talk 15:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I know. The edit I was referring to displayed "Australian Aborigine", and I kept the display. However, AFAIK, "Australian Aborigine" redirects to "Indigenous Australians". I was just fixing that link to kill the redirect. — Dale Arnett 17:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lions_rugby_logo_2007.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lions_rugby_logo_2007.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 19:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Delasin citizenship[edit]

Thanks for noticing that Dorothy Delasin had been listed on LPGA with the USA flag icon. Actually she is an American, born in Texas and raised in San Franciso. She has dual citizenship -- something that the Philippine government gives out pretty easily (or more easily than the US government does) because her parents were both born there. That's how it was possible for her to compete for the Philippines in the World Cup of Golf. I've updated the page to reflect that. --Crunch 18:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll accept it. She has represented the Philippines in the Women's World Cup of Golf, which was what I was going on, but I should have done a little more digging. :) — Dale Arnett 18:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-articles[edit]

Yes one of the potential benefits of the table is to be able to update all the links by making only one edit whenever something is split apart from the main article of each college, or from the main sports department article, etc. This would have an even greater effect if also used in the infoboxes. Another strategy would be get a complete list of what all the sub-article titles should be, then deliberately link to them whether they exist or not, then create redirects wherever there is a red link. --fullcourt 02:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Updates (Rush Limbaugh)[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Updates (Rush Limbaugh), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of proposal: Guideline/policy governing lists[edit]

Dear editor:

Given your extensive experience here on Wikipedia, I would greatly appreciate your input on the following topic:

Wikipedia: Village pump (policy)#Proposal to make a policy or guideline for lists

Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic.

Regards,

Sidatio 15:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: 2007-08 Top 14 season[edit]

Updated DYK query On 18 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2007-08 Top 14 season, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai 08:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of sporting events[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of sporting events, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sporting events. Thank you. Paulbrock 01:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introduced species[edit]

Please provide citations if you can ([2]). I found a suitable one on the web and have added it. Richard001 09:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive[edit]

Shudde talk 05:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

College football WikiProject family[edit]

I'm glad that somebody else appreciates my humor. ;) --B 18:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Original Barnstar
I, Chrislk02, award you this original barnstar for your hard work and expansion of William E. McAnulty, Jr. and proposing a new DYK hook for the nom that was not even yours!. DYK is a dirty, under appreciated job and I want to make sure you feel appreciated. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, but it's not my nomination. I just improved on it.  :) — Dale Arnett 13:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline-191[edit]

I have to thank you, merely hours after my imperfect edit, you fixed it. I added a parenthetic note to the article on Harry Turtledove's Timeline-191 explaining the reference behind the stab-in-the-back, and you corrected it to link to the appropriate article, something my German skills would never have allowed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.212.160 (talk) 10:26, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject horse training[edit]

Hallo, I saw your edits of Coolmore Stud, are you interested in horses? Wikipedia:WikiProject horse training would need someone of your wiki experience to tidy up the Project page. Any help would be much appreciated. - Culnacréann 15:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tyson Gay[edit]

Thanks for adding Tyson Gay to List of people from Kentucky. I have been trying to keep every member of this list cited in case we are able to determine criteria for inclusion and nominate it for featured status. Ordinarily, I just comment out uncited additions, but I know 1) that you are right about Gay; I just don't have time to cite it myself at the moment, and 2) that you are an experienced editor, know where I'm coming from, and can probably provide a cite pretty quickly. Would you mind doing so at your earliest convenience? Thanks. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 11:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • You asked for it, you got it. — Dale Arnett 14:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks so much. BTW, several months ago I did a significant amount of work on this list, thinking I could get it to featured status. Since then, my editing experience has helped me see the need for criteria for inclusion/exclusion for the list to be featured. How feasible do you think it would be to reach any kind of consensus on such criteria? Do you think this list could ever become a featured list? Acdixon (talk contribs count) 14:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated 2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 04:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 8 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 02:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping. :) —Disavian (talk/contribs) 22:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Tri Nations Series[edit]

The 2007 Tri Nations Series article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 08:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heartland XV logo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Heartland XV logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bud Billiken GA[edit]

Thanks for helping get the article started. You may want to add this to your user page:

--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 23:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Montchav for adminship[edit]

Hi Dale, I'm considering running for adminship, but would like someone's view on this. You may or may not know who I am, but I'm quite a quiet editor, who gets about the "job" with little fuss. I wasn't sure who to ask about my potential being a candidate, as I've not really got any "wikifriends", but I seem to have overlapped with you on more than one occassion, and you seem pretty respected here. Would now be a good time to run - I think I have had enough edits and enough experience with AFD and the like, but am worried that my lack of "user interaction" (and maybe my lack of Featured Articles) may cause a problem. Do you have any suggestions? Do you know me well enough to perhaps nominate me? If you do, let me know before the vote starts. How important is having an FA to running for adminship? Thanks, --Montchav 11:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • My thoughts:
    • I have no problems with you running at all. I don't know how important having wikifriends is, but my guess is your activity in things like AfD will certainly help.
    • I noticed you put up an RfA page. I'll watch it for activity the next couple of days, and may put in my word this weekend.
    • I seriously doubt that your lack of FAs will be a problem. I don't have a single FA to this day. In fact, Bud Billiken Parade and Picnic is my first recognition in the GA category (I didn't create it, but I made it into a workable stub and others took it from there). Of course, I was an admin before the FA process really got off the ground, but I still think lack of FAs is a non-issue. — Dale Arnett 14:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 1 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2001 GMAC Bowl, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, DarkFalls talk 06:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Allen3 talk 10:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)-->[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 9 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jannie du Plessis, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 22:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry S. Truman[edit]

There is a discussion that you might want to weigh in on, Talk:Harry_S._Truman#The_.22Roswell_Incident.22, thanks. WikiDon 05:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted articles[edit]

hi, I have noticed that you do a lot of work on sports, I would like your assistance with something. An admin User:Yamla went and deleted a load of good quality football articles, see his [log]. Many of them have been restored, but there are still a lot missing There are still lots of red links between 15:34 Oct 22 and 16:18 in his log. Could you look at the articles and assess whether they are wortth re-creating. Thanks, King of the North East (T/C) 21:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created this, was your request right? I have nominated for DYK, but you may want to have a look over it. - Shudde talk 03:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: African American boxers & other sportspeople[edit]

The edit histories show that you are the creator of several categories which have been nominated for merging into Category:African American sportspeople.

This CFD began on October 27, so don't delay if you wish to participate in the discussion. Cgingold 09:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Houston Nutt[edit]

I wanted to tell you that I reversed your edit because Nutt himself said that he was not leaving nor has been fired yet from Arkansas. As of right now, it is just speculation. Dawg1279 (talk) 02:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • No prob. I only added the italics... someone else actually added his name to the list of postseason changes. I figure you've fixed that one too... — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's Big 12, NOT Big XII![edit]

Just wanted to let you know that offically, the name of the conference is offically called the "Big 12 Conference", not the "Big XII Conference", even though it looks that way in the logo. We talked about this a year ago IIRC, and that anonymous contributor was incorrect. AT first I thought it was you, but after researching the past edits, it wasn't you. I apologise to you. NoseNuggets (talk) 5:12 AM US EST Nov 26 2007. Edited 5:21 US EST Nov 26 2007.

Thanks![edit]

Just wanted to say thanks for fixing the Alltel Stadium/Jacksonville Memorial Stadium thing in the 2007 ACC Championship Game article. I didn't know that naming rights expired back in January, and appreciate it.

Also, I was wondering if you could take a look at a featured article candidate I've submitted. I know you've done a lot of work on various sports articles, and your opinion would be really helpful. I'm having a lot of trouble getting enough people to support the article, but any comments would be appreciated. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl

Thanks for all your help, and keep up the good work! JKBrooks85 23:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The actual name IIRC is "Jacksonville Municipal Stadium", not "Jacksonville Memorial Stadium". NoseNuggets (talk) 10:27 AM US EST Jan 2 2008 HAPPY NEW YEAR!

DYK nom[edit]

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 6 December, 2007, a fact from the article Patrick Mills, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 17:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football December 2007 Newsletter[edit]

The December 2007 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 14 December, 2007, a fact from the article Ken Niumatalolo, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri (talk) 12:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Mauk[edit]

Thanks for helping out with the Mauk page. 'Twas a bit dinky. I appreciate the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesserm (talkcontribs) 23:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Boca Juniors logo 2006.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Boca Juniors logo 2006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THE WNT[edit]

Hallo, do you know who was the first captain of the United States women's national soccer team? DONOVAN (talk) 16:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Rhodes Scholars[edit]

Thanks for your work on Notable Rhodes Scholars; it's nice to have some help! Pdfpdf (talk) 01:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of observations and questions:

  • There is a difference between Harvard College and Harvard University. I don't know if the difference is important; do you?
  • You have nominated a university for a number of entries marked with "University uncertain". I'm not sure if that's useful. (e.g. UC Berkeley is not the only campus of UC, let alone not the only university in California. Also, wouldn't you put "UC Berkeley" rather than "California"?) Your thoughts?

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 01:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • (1) You're right on the Harvard detail. Go ahead and change the "Harvard University" to "Harvard College". (2) I got ahead of myself a little. I should have looked at the reference tag. :) (3) Generally, "California" by itself refers to the Berkeley campus. Other campuses are either referred to as "California-XXXX" or "UC XXXX". The Los Angeles campus is pretty much universally called "UCLA". — Dale Arnett (talk) 04:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Update: Changed the Harvard edits to point to the undergrad college, and undid the uncertain schools I had "nominated". In the case of Tom McMillen (listed under his full name of Charles Thomas McMillen), I'm old enough to remember him as a basketball player at the College Park campus of Maryland, so I pointed his school link there. — Dale Arnett (talk) 04:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff. Thanks. Pdfpdf (talk) 05:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(Given that 32-Americans-per-year are awarded scholarships, there's scope for lots of "notables"!) Pdfpdf (talk) 05:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My! You have been busy!! Don't let me interrupt you, but ...
Perhaps you can explain something for me?
As I said before, There is a difference between Harvard College and Harvard University. I don't know if the difference is important; do you?.
It would appear to me that you might understand the difference.
It now appears to me that Harvard College only awards "undergraduate" (for want of a better name) degrees, Harvard College is the only "Harvard institution" that awards "undergraduate" degrees, and ALL other "Harvard institutions" (only) award post-graduate degrees.
Is that correct? Pdfpdf (talk) 09:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(I had wrongly assumed that there were other "Harvard institutions" (other than Harvard College) that awarded "undergraduate degrees", hence my no-doubt-annoying edits - sorry about that. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

  • As far as I know, the only unit of Harvard University that awards undergraduate degrees is Harvard College. By the time women became eligible for Rhodes Scholarships in 1977, graduates of Harvard's former all-female undergraduate unit of Radcliffe College were being issued Harvard degrees signed by the presidents of Harvard and Radcliffe. Starting in the fall (autumn) of 1977, women enrolled directly into Harvard College, and Radcliffe dissolved itself in 1999 and became a women's studies institute within Harvard University. On another topic, I did find that some of the people with two U.S. degrees got them from graduate-level schools (e.g., Mel Reynolds' Harvard degree was a Master's in Public Administration from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, and at least a couple others had earned law degrees before going to Oxford). — Dale Arnett (talk) 15:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ospreys new badge.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ospreys new badge.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football January 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The January 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK custom[edit]

It is customary to use the hooks that are about to expire before using the newer ones. Ali Williams was expanded substantially on January 6th. Somebody complained about it. If I'm not mistaken, you selected the hook for the next update. This custom seems to be followed by others. If one skips to too recent hooks, the older ones tend to expire and don't get on.

Sometimes if the 5 day hooks are not very good, I'll select a 4 day old hook. I never pick a 1-3 day old hook unless it's really necessary. I'm writing to let you know of customs that you might already know, not to scold you. Good work on your previous DYK's. Archtransit (talk) 00:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • No prob. FYI, I wasn't the one who added the Williams item to the page. Someone else had put his item on the template with two hooks and asked that one be picked. I assumed good faith and picked one. I normally just look at what's on the template update page, and may fix or add links if I see a need for them. — Dale Arnett (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK (Werner Greeff)[edit]

Alrighty, I'll give the writing credit to Jimmy Pitt then, surprised i missed that. I'm pretty sure one does not get credit for alt. hooks (though if you originally nommed it, not sure if you did, that does count). Wizardman 21:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nope. Jimmy gets writing credit, Shudde (talk · contribs) gets nomination credit since he beat me to it.  :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 21:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Okay. Would you be able to give them the credit templates then? (I'd do it but I'm busy updating the hooks for next update) Wizardman 21:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I would know if there is a dash. The website is not a reliable source. There are numerous errors on the website. In addition to this, the school was created as a merger between Madisonville High School, North Hopkins High School, and several others. In light of this, it would make sense to have a dash. If you have a problem, discuss it. Don't arbitrarily remove someone's edits, especially if they have gone to the school for two years. 72.51.165.224 (talk) 22:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Six Nations Championship squads[edit]

Hi there, thanks for helping out with the 2008 Six Nations Championship squads page. Can you help me edit the caps for the Italian squad. Most of the player's caps are avaliable on the 2007 Rugby World Cup website. If you click on a player from the squads list then at the bottom in "All international matches summary" it tells you how many caps the player has.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikerevill (talkcontribs) 20:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

College Football and media markets[edit]

Just wanted to say thanks to you for your contributions to the page I created. You really have done your research! 67.105.21.234 (talk) 00:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football February 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The February 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of rugby union Test caps leaders[edit]

List of rugby union Test caps leaders looks very good. You should consider nominating for a peer-review, because it may be WP:FL material. Regardless, it's a nice list. - Shudde talk 03:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to this publication [1], the song title "How Long" does not have a question mark. Pedantic, I know, but it is a reputable, reliable source.

  1. ^ Roberts, David (2006). British Hit Singles & Albums (19th ed.). London: Guinness World Records Limited. pp. p. 13. ISBN 1-904994-10-5. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)

Cheers,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Derek... in that case, could you change the title of the song article then? I was going by the article title. — Dale Arnett (talk) 21:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Baseball season[edit]

Dale, in my edit here, I said: "Dale, maybe it's time to get ready for the new season? Is there an official list of who's retired? Shawn Green retired yesterday". Can you assist? Thanks, Happy138 (talk) 13:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football March 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The March 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wembley Stadium matches, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Wembley Stadium matches. JVG (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:CHLru7[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:CHLru7 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Emmenecker article[edit]

Dale Arnett, the article on Adam Emmenecker is fantastic. Great job on the creation. --Josh (talk) 01:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that, even though the ladies teams go by the name Cowgirls, the article's previous location creates better consistency. If all college men's basketball teams are located at School Team men's basketball, there's no guesswork. This makes finding them and linking to them much easier. →Wordbuilder (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hmmm. Thinking about this one... while "Cowboys basketball" is more correct, you do have a point. Maybe the best solution is to move back to "men's basketball" until such time that the Cowgirls get an article. Then, move the men's article back to the correct "Cowboys basketball".(Note that Tennessee and LSU both have separate men's and women's nicknames AND separate men's and women's basketball articles.) Perhaps this issue should be discussed at WikiProject College Basketball. — Dale Arnett (talk) 13:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Adam Emmenecker[edit]

Updated DYK query On 17 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Adam Emmenecker, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Good work! BencherliteTalk 01:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do I count over 25 DYKs on your list? BencherliteTalk 02:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You sure do. — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in that case...

The 25 DYK Medal
A long-overdue award to Dale Arnett to reflect a committed Wikipedian's dedication
to the creation of new and interesting articles. BencherliteTalk 02:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might also want to add yourself to User:Anonymous_Dissident/List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_DYKs. Well done again! BencherliteTalk 02:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2007-08 Drake Bulldogs men's basketball team[edit]

Great job on cleaning up and adding to the 2007-08 Drake Bulldogs article and thank you very much. You are doing great work and I am proud to call you a fellow Wikipedian. --Josh (talk) 15:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football April 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The April 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for Wikipedians for a User Study[edit]

Hello. I am a graduate student in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota. We are conducting research on ways to engage content experts on Wikipedia. Previously, Wikipedia started the Adopt-a-User program to allow new users to get to know seasoned Wikipedia editors. We are interested in learning more about how this type of relationship works. Based on your editing record on Wikipedia, we thought you might be interested in participating. If chosen to participate, you will be compensated for your time. We estimate that most participants will spend an hour (over two weeks on your own time and from your own computer) on the study. To learn more or to sign up contact KATPA at CS dot UMN dot EDU or User:KatherinePanciera/WPMentoring. Thanks. KatherinePanciera (talk) 01:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LSU Tigers football[edit]

As you being an admin and a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject College football, could I get you to take a look at this situation: Talk:Louisiana StateTigers football? Thanks in advance. Sf46 (talk) 13:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Looks like another admin beat me to it.  :) Thanks anyway. — Dale Arnett (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hillcrest/Burns[edit]

Thanks for catching/fixing my error on the Hillcrest Country Club article. I thought George Burns had died, but the article seemed to indicate otherwise. Thanks for clarifying. Cbl62 (talk) 22:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Age distribution[edit]

In the article on Montpelier, Vermont, you changed the description in the demographics from the canned wording to "age distribution," which I agree is an improvement. As you know the other awkward wording is all over the country in articles. While I'm not sure that "age distribution" is absolutely the best wording, it sure beats what was there before. Do you suppose we could get a bot to change this nationwide for us? Student7 (talk) 21:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I saw you tagged one section of Colgate University for a split. Since you tagged the article, could you please give some justification for why you tagged it, and why it should be split? We're discussing at Talk:Colgate University/Archive 1#Split Colgate Raiders?. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Bob Knight[edit]

Can you tell me what you mean by this edit? Do you have a source for your claim? If so, it should be the primary and the quote should be changed to match. Otherwise, your note should be removed. Let me know. Thanks! →Wordbuilder (talk) 15:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll comment it out for the time being. There's an ESPN clip, "Top 10 Bob Knight Soundbites", circulating on YouTube (blatant copyvio, but AFAIK it hasn't been pulled) that includes the original version. — Dale Arnett (talk) 15:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: I found a Larry King Live transcript that includes the original quote, labeled as being from a video clip. I'll use that version. — Dale Arnett (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're just going to replace the quote and cite the new source? I think that would be better than adding a comment. →Wordbuilder (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • No. I commented out my last edit until I could find the source. I'm in the middle of replacing the quote now. — Dale Arnett (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • Looks good. I didn't even realize it was wrong. I should have noticed. I've watched that ESPN clip on YouTube. Thanks for fixing it and keep up the great work. →Wordbuilder (talk) 16:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football May 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The May 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project[edit]

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-two minute times in Derby[edit]

Hi, Dale. At the Sham_(horse) article, it mentions that Northern Dancer also put in a sub-two minute time in the Derby. I actually don't know much about the Derby but it seems like you might. Is that true? The Northern Dancer article doesn't mention the times. Also Sham's page mentions that the sub-two minute time for Sham is disputable because of the accuracy of the timing back then. Perhaps there should be a footnote on the Derby page regarding Sham's time. Jason Quinn (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. First, Northern Dancer's official time in 1964 was 2 minutes flat. Second, you may have a point on the issue of Sham's timing. Maybe the best thing to do is to say that the only indisputable sub-two-minute times in the Derby were those of Secretariat and Monarchos, and note Sham as a possible third. — Dale Arnett (talk) 22:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Euroleague 2007-08[edit]

Hello! You wrote, what Real have more Euroleague titles than CSKA. It's true. But Real haven't got titles in Euroleague. It's only in FIBA Champions Cup. User:Artur9501, 18:21, 6 May, 2008.

And can You explain what is this:

Actually, Real DOES have more "Euroleague" titles than CSKA. ULEB, the body that organizes the competition, officially recognizes European Champions Cup titles as fully equal to Euroleague crowns. ULEB's official match report of the Euroleague final clearly states:

As for the graphic, I don't know how it got there, but it looks like a chocolate-chip cookie.  :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 03:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Liga[edit]

Hello, just a quick note on the qualifying to the new 3rd Liga in Germany. While you are right, Carl Zeiss Jena is already relegated from the 2nd Bundesliga, this does not mean the club has a place in the 3rd Liga guarantied. Financial qualification will also be necerssary, to my knowledge, otherwise they might still go down to the Regionalliga instead. I havn't heared anything about Jena not getting a licence but we may have to wait a while till we can say for sure who will really make up this league. I might add subject to DFB approval to it to make this clear. Have fun, all the best, EA210269 (talk) 06:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Go right ahead and make the change, if you haven't already done so.  :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 06:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, all done! :) EA210269 (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Atlantic10 Main Logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Atlantic10 Main Logo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]