User talk:CastJared

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia as of June 2023.

Hello, CastJared, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 20:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  signed, Rosguill talk 00:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CastJared (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stating that I should have competence. CastJared (talk) 01:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a valid unblock request rationale, consensus forming at ANI that this was a good block. Daniel (talk) 02:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 02:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CastJared (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block will no longer be necessary because I will not continue to cause a disruption and will make useful contributions instead. CastJared (talk) 02:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

Please show your ability to do so on another project. Repeated unblock requests here will lead to you losing access to edit this page. Star Mississippi 02:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, CastJared,
Please take a deep breath and avoid the impulse to post another unblock request. Typically at 3 declined unblock requests, talk page access is taken away. I really recommend reviewing WP:Guide to appealing blocks which really tells you what reviewing administrators are looking for from blocked editors. Thoughtfully consider the issues that editors and admins had with your editing behavior and think how you can change that behavior. Do not simply apologize and promise to do better, you have to offer a convincing response that indicates you understand what the problems were. Really, review that guide and take a few days or weeks before posting another unblock request. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, I should know this and I have to think before posting an appeal request. CastJared (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

UTRS appeal #76369 [edit]

is closed. User should figure out how their editing was disruptive and what to do instead before again requesting unblocking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playa San Juan Leighton (July 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I've no doubt this beach exists, but that's not enough to warrant inclusion. The sources cited provide no evidence of notability, or indeed much meaningful content (raising the question where is all this information coming from?).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, CastJared! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CastJared&oldid=1167855111"