User talk:Bollinger

Welcome!

Hello, Bollinger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 17:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

D4 video connector = AAUI connector / FriendlyNet ?[edit]

Hi, I just noticed your change to the D4 article, do you have a source verifying that connectors are the same - they certainly look similar in photographs but I couldn't find any web sources saying they used the same connector. Let me know - thanks. Megapixie 00:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no sources. I've looked at both though. They're the same. They even use the same teeth-style clamping system. I could scrounge up a close-up of both connectors (separately) if you'd like. I could get the FriendlyNet one easily, the other one will take a couple days.

You're right, I should have called it an AAUI connector. I forgot about that name. With the proper name on there, the article can even be cross-linked. Maybe I should link the D4 connector picture into the AAUI article.

I don't understand Wikipedia's obsession with verifying sources now. I and a couple others put some great info in the NeGcon article. We couldn't have done any of that verifiably because it's not like anyone ever took enough interest in the NeGcon to write up an encyclopedic record of it before.

Anyway, I think this information is verifiable in and of itself. Anyone can look at these two things and see they are the same. You did it yourself. Maybe you're the verifying source.--Bollinger 15:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Verifiability is a fairly important principle - it means that other people can confirm what we have written. Without it you could assert anything - I am Elvis, etc. I agree they definately look very very very similar - but do they actually fit together ? If you could actually test that - I'd accept that. Megapixie 01:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to grab my AAUI transceiver and drive up to San Francisco (where the Japanese HDTV I saw is now) because someone on the net said so. You wanted useful info, I gave it. If you don't believe it, then I recommend you correct it to what you believe to be true or just plain remove it.

I believe my own eyes. I've seen both connectors, they are identical. It's plenty verifiable. If anyone decides to verify it, they will found out the same thing I did. I am somewhat insulted you compare what I posted to someone asserting that they are a dead celebrity.

Curling[edit]

Thank you for correcting the burning issue. This particular article has a lot of good material in it but was throughout excessively verbose and rambley, I think it would say the same thing much better using about half the words. The goal was to heavily cut the words without cutting the meaning but in this case I guess I did cut some meaning, better under cooked than over cooked though. The burning section as it stood was pretty hard to follow unless you already knew the subject. E x nihil ^(talk) 11:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TOCARaceDriver3BoxArt.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TOCARaceDriver3BoxArt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bollinger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:PS1DualAnalogController.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PS1DualAnalogController.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 23:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bollinger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]