User talk:BananaBreadPie12

Welcome![edit]

Hi BananaBreadPie12! I noticed your contributions to Radhika Apte and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 15:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I'm always happy to see new users contributing to anti-vandalism efforts. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊|𝕽𝕴𝕻 🇬🇧|☎️|📄 16:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Wishing BananaBreadPie12 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 11:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 18:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

February 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Shrek 2, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Zsohl ^(Talk) 19:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. I will add a source, so don't worry. BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 19:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is that better? BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of notable deaths in 200 million BCE (February 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You are absolutely welcome to create this page for test purposes in your sandbox.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of notable deaths in 200 million BCE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lol BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BananaBreadPie12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand why I was blocked. BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 23:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BananaBreadPie12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why I was blocked BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 23:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In addition to significant competance issues, your early edits are not those of a new user and, technically speaking, you're editing from the same narrowly-allocated range as Whyisitsoblue who was denied an unblock 10 days before this account was created. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BananaBreadPie12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Coincedences may happen, you know? Not all new users follow a pattern, yes? What is my competence issue? Why was I blocked? I tried my best!

Decline reason:

Edits like your very last one before the block make you seem either, well, just not all there or a troll. I rather think it's the latter. I also find the basis for the socking allegation credible. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 23:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand[edit]

@Daniel Case @Bbb23How was my section trolling? I really don't understand how that was trolling at all. Enlighten me on how that was trolling. BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock, I don't deserve this block.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BananaBreadPie12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I literally got blocked for no reason, I have no idea why my Requests for Permissions was trolling, how was I trolling, and even if I was a sockpuppet, why block me now, when I have clearly done good things for Wikipedia?

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not persuade me to unblock you. PhilKnight (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 15:35, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the e-mail BBP12 just sent me, I've disabled e-mail access as well.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #69951[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

Following UTRS appeal #80294. I have unblocked your account, to give you another chance. I hope you will make good use of this second chance. Please be careful, and avoid being blocked again, because if you are blocked for a second time, it is much less likely that you will be unblocked again. JBW (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. BananaBreadPie12 (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]