User talk:Arjun024
Welcome!
Please “sign” (~~~~) your messages.
Note:Replies of any discussion started here will be replied here itself. Please drop a Talkback box if you have any messages for me elsewhere.
FA at risk[edit]
Hi Arjun, I was just going through the list of featured articles (Economy of India is one of them) and I'm concerned that if the article gets re-reviewed, I'm pretty sure it's going to get axed from the list. For one, users like this go around various articles and copy-paste the most POV-loaded and poorly written paragraphs into the article. Then there's the matter of having a section like Issues. I'm currently working on integrated the "Issues" into their respective sections because having a section like Issues seems completely unencylopedic and really an opportunity for people to cherrypick certian facts and then just clump them into one section without taking into account the greater context of the situation. Vedant (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- The "Issues" section seem to be bit bulky; and moreover it's got some generic topics to deal with (Corruption, Govt, Labor laws ...), that don't well fit into other sections. what say? Arjuncodename024 12:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree the issues need to be mentioned but I'm generally opposed to block quotes (as they seem indicative of WP:POVPUSH). I think atleast the following can be done:
- Issues/Agriculture -> Sectors/Agriculture
- Economic Disparities -> Income/Consumption
- Labour Laws -> Employment
- Issues/Corruption and Issues/Government -> New section titled Government Involvement
- Issues/Infrastructure -> A new section titled Infrastructure
- I agree the issues need to be mentioned but I'm generally opposed to block quotes (as they seem indicative of WP:POVPUSH). I think atleast the following can be done:
- This would atleast cut down the issues section which is a bad idea to keep in a featured article. I'm not saying we don't talk about the issue (they're important after all). What I am suggesting though is that we deal with them in their respective sections and present a complete depiction (and not just a one-sided one). Let me know what you think. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK problem[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Prayopavesa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LittleMountain5 20:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for talking up here. Over to template talk. Arjuncodename024 12:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Operation Bluestar[edit]
Hi fellow editor, wanted to check with you whether the source I added here was sufficient to stop the edit war between you and Profitoftruth? Thanks and Best Wishes --Sikh-History 17:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- No dear friend. Sikhs describe Op Bluestar as a massacre means that it's a massacre from a Sikh Point of view. It in no way implies that the assertion is from a Neutral POV. As merriam websters tells me; massacre is "the act or an instance of killing a number of usually helpless or unresisting human beings under circumstances of atrocity or cruelty". This does not apply to this event. The military moved in to clear the Sikh separatists who resisted, ensuing an armed conflict. Categorizing this a massacre is not all correct. Thanks for talking this up here. Arjuncodename024 17:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Arjun, given the fact that certain editors with obvious and singular motives are involved in this debate, I think it is best for me to recuse myself from this debate. As much as I don't think it was a massacre in a place of worship, it's probably best I stay on the sidelines lest this whole debate go off course and turn into someone promoting Indian nationalism or whatever claim is conjured up. Good luck though. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- You are right buddy. May be the discussion will be overlooked as my "canvassing" (!). Regards Arjuncodename024 12:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- *sigh*... such are the perils of open-editing. I'm not inherently opposed to the concept but it's pretty clear that some users - while editing under the banner of NPOV - have very singular motives and intentions. Thus while not adding any objectionable content that violates WP policy, they aim to portray certain entities in a very particular light.Vedant (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- You are right buddy. May be the discussion will be overlooked as my "canvassing" (!). Regards Arjuncodename024 12:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Arjun, given the fact that certain editors with obvious and singular motives are involved in this debate, I think it is best for me to recuse myself from this debate. As much as I don't think it was a massacre in a place of worship, it's probably best I stay on the sidelines lest this whole debate go off course and turn into someone promoting Indian nationalism or whatever claim is conjured up. Good luck though. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Mango[edit]
Both the links that has been provided (Oxford and American Encyclopedia) points to the fact that Mango indeed came from Tamil: Mankay and not from Malayalam: Mankaa. Can you name one variety of Mango that is native of Kerala?
You have been disruptive here in distorting facts. I have not brought in my Tamil Nationalist sentiments here. You would do good if you carefully select your words before vomiting here when you write your comments. And you should not hurt others while you give your comments. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by அருநாடன்2 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Prayopavesa[edit]
 | On July 20, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Prayopavesa, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 18:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
NITC IMAGE[edit]
Hey new to the wikipedia editing interface. I have a better NITC logo without the white background/transparent. Do let me know how to edit it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek1912 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- I had an NITC image in my userpage as well; but the file was deleted by an administrator due to copyright issues. Pls read Wikipedia:Images and Wikipedia:Copyrights and make sure the image adheres to Wikipedia policies. I wish i could help you more, but i happen to be bit busy now; and i am not really cool with these copyvio issues. Regards. Arjuncodename024 13:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Mediation[edit]
Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) has agreed to mediate our discussion here--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Mediation[edit]
Your opinion would be much appreciated, if you wished to chime in here. Regards, Salvio Let's talk 'bout it! 15:22, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Andrott[edit]
As a Malayalam speaker, could you add the Malayalam script for Andrott? Also, could you add the interwiki (in Malayalam Wikipedia) for it, as despite being the largest settlement in Lakshadweep, no-one has added to the article.
Many Thanks. --92.8.198.159 (talk) 16:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- I have given a try at the Malayalam transliteration. Arjuncodename024 15:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm closing the case as stale, after a week of inactivity; should this dispute flare up again, feel free to reopen without prejudice. Salvio Let's talk 'bout it! 14:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:13, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010[edit]
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to more contributions from you!
|
|---|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
A discussion pertaining your recent edits is under-way on Talk:Criticism_of_Hinduism#Philosophy_section. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Arjun,[edit]
Hi Arjun, Is that - Saint Thomas Christians or Syrian Malabar Nasrani or Nasranis are not the part of Indian Religions? Why? Kerala is not the part of India or not?
Syrian Christianity found at AD52 (1st Century)- BUT THAT IS NOT AN INDIAN RELIGION Sikhism found at AD 1400 (14th Century)
why everyone hate Keralites? Christians? is anyone from this group fight against our nation?
St Thomas Christians are world's ancient Christian Community than any other English Nations, their rituals are different from the global Christians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianDreams (talk • contribs) 09:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Indian religions are religions indigenous to India; Christianity is not indigenous to India, so are any of its forms. Saying "Syrian" Christianity is Indian is like saying Chinese food is European. Arjuncodename024 14:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
APPEAL TO YOU Reg: [BRAHMAN PUJAN] , [UNIVERSAL PRAYERS] . written by [Naresh Sonee] On wikipedia , These above two pages are far older than the present article [Brahman] References of above titles are also available on New York site - http://www.printsasia.com/BookDetails.aspx?Id=445813482 Meanwhile, Can your good selves in Wiki Project Indian Community re-create a precise pages on [Naresh Sonee] & his book [Brahmand Pujan] – [Brahmaand Pujan] . However, Sonee is the writer of this book [Brahmand Pujan] written in 1999 . registered with Government of India- HRRD. Details of the registration is provided here on http://brhmaandpujanbook.tripod.com/ . More than sufficient, news and reviews are there on http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ Since 5-6 yrs, for one or the other reason pages of [Naresh Sonee] & [Brahmand Pujan] are faced by communal bias from outside India so these articles over and again get deleted here in Wikipedia for minor reasons. However, many hits of - Naresh Sonee reflects on google search engine also. So, I request Wiki Indian community to kindly come forward and generously help these two pages to grow, as I am fed up to fight my case alone here [left] and moved out long back. Meanwhile, such an important info/issue on ‘Indian literature’ which adds & spell ‘new meaning /dimension’ to Brahman -should it stay lost else ignored? Your community panel has to judge at last. Myself, will not be on Wikipedia, for the same i apologise, but- pls. help these two pages to get reinstalled, reap, sow and grow, if you too feel so, I appeal to do this munificent favour. Regards- Dralansun (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Added template for SuggestBot[edit]
Hi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 20:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Could you take a look at this article, particularly at the edits of User: Profitoftruth85[1][2], which seem to be deliberately inserting bias (with misleading edit summaries) to an otherwise very stable and well-written lead[3]? Particularly problematic are his violations of WP:POINT and WP:RECENTISM in this case.117.194.192.68 (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Arjun024! Martyrdevasahayam.org is neither unreliable nor a shadow wesite of a radical religious group, but the official website of the martyr`s devotees who pray for his sainthood. Removing the link ,it seems, is not unbiased. An article about a Christian martyr shall never be blind or silent about the truth-telling all the atrocities committed against him knowingly/unknowingly on those days. Neutrality can never be maintained by allowing vested interests to throw mud on the central character as was evident in earlier edits.Kindly refer only printed and published books, preferably the old vintage ones, but not magazines which are `coloured` or mouthpieces of some radical elements. Regaeds,--Kumaripriya (talk) 14:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nithya Menon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Wangond (talk) 17:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Rice and curry. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.--Wangond (talk) 16:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
You have again removed referenced content. Another revert will be dealed with a vandalism report. --Wangond (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- You are a sanctimonious vandal and you know it. Go and report to whoever it is. All my edits are accompanied by well written summaries. Your reference of "Southscope, March 2011" has no credibility and even if it did, many mainstream references prove otherwise. Arjuncodename024 16:48, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
WP uses popular name given in mainstream reliable media, not by stuff reported by magazines like "Southscope". Arjuncodename024 16:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Why is Southscope not credible? It is produced by Allu Aravind, top producer of Telugu cinema. You shouldn't talk about people without any knowlegde. I guess, you have no southscope at home to read it, and that's why you are against this particular source and call me a vandal. --Wangond (talk) 16:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's without a doubt unreliable and your unlinked reference makes it unverifiable as well. Arjuncodename024 16:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I see, this is not a content dispute, but a reliability problem according to you. Then you may start a reliable source discussion at the appropriate board. Meanwhile, the source stays according to Biography criteria, since this needs to be handled as Vandalism by my understanding. --Wangond (talk) 17:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's without a doubt unreliable and your unlinked reference makes it unverifiable as well. Arjuncodename024 16:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
National security act 1980(India) article[edit]
From history I knew that you have created this article.But I think you can expand this article as it is almost a stub.Please see my userpage in case you want to know a bit about me. Keep up your good work and happy years of editing! Suri 100 (talk) 10:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
New article[edit]
Wotcher,
How about starting a new article called "Langauges of Kerala" ?
(Rameez pp (talk) 08:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC))
- If you are talking about "Dialects of Malayalam" you could go by that. But i am not sure you will find a lot of supporting material. Arjuncodename024 15:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
It is not about "Dialects of Malayalam", it's about "Langauges of Kerala", like Tribal langauges..
(Rameez pp (talk) 16:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC))
Cengagebrain.com[edit]
Didn't look at all promising, shouldn't we use the actual publisher as at [4] - and a link to [5]. Dougweller (talk) 09:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. i have changed the publisher's name. i just think that the url is much better (and therefore easily verifiable) if pointed to the exact page. Do change if you think otherwise. Arjuncodename024 11:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Why the cited text about Buddha's birth in Odisha was taken out?[edit]
I have cited references supporting that buddha was born in Odisha, Wikipedia is not about a single view saying this is it. There are many evidences supporting this fact and many researchers have stated that Buddha was born in Odisha, isn't it a kind of partiality by simply removing this Please see the following references
References[edit]
--ସୁଭପାSubha PaUtter2me! 03:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Because, it's WP:FRINGE, just a claim Arjuncodename024 11:23, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
An Invite to join the WikiProject Railways in India[edit]
         File:Goldenchariot train luxury service in india.jpg 
| ||
| - - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Railways in India- - - - - - - - - - - - | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hi, Arjun024, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Railways ! The WikiProject Indian Railways in India is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, Railways in India and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Railways in India. | ||
|
As you have shown an interest in article related to Railways in India we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions. | ||
| We look forward to welcoming you to the project! | ||
naveenpf (talk) 02:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
An Invite to join the WikiProject Indian Roads[edit]
        
| ||
| - - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Indian Roads - - - - - - - - - - - - | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hi, Arjun024, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Roads ! The WikiProject Indian Roads is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Roads. | ||
|
As you have shown an interest in article related to Indian roads we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions. | ||
| We look forward to welcoming you to the project! | ||
Selective removal.. etc Malayalam[edit]
Could you explain what you mean?--Malaikaran (talk) 14:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC) I would like to explain, why there is less content.. First of all most of the content was fiction. The strangely presented story was also sourced badly with dubious content like "arya ezhuthu" as a name for the Grantha script. Malayalam was influenced by Sanskrit, has many words in it, but to say it has over 80% Sanskrit words in it is pure nonsense and unbackable by any reliable sources. If it had over 80% Sanskrit I could never understand my mothertongue. It is a total lie or a non-knowledgable editor, who was pushing for Sanskrit. Additionally try to find a gbook with the word Grantha Bhasha in it. Zero results. Maybe this helps to understand some of the action I made to improve the intro.--Malaikaran (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have moved the discussion to the article talk page. Hope you do not mind. see Talk:Malayalam#Selective removal.. etc Malayalam . Arjuncodename024 05:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop making racist comments[edit]
like here: [6] --Malaikaran (talk) 11:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
For the record : Malaikaran (talk · contribs) indefinitely blocked. Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Kalarimaster. Arjuncodename024 06:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Edits of Manipravalam[edit]
Hi, I noticed you editing Manipravalam and have added more sources demonstrating why it is described as a mixture of Sanskrit and Tamil. Hope that helps. Lifebonzza (talk) 09:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Gandhi page move[edit]
I'm afraid you can't have a page move A--> B or C. It is aginst the rules. Please reply on the Gandhi talk page. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well, i am strong opposer of Red tape. I think it's implied in such a move request that the users who voice their opinion need to specify which one they support/oppose. And I have already made my case at the move discussion. Cheers Arjuncodename024 17:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
What is the problem with Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi please? This move would open a can of worms. Wouldnt argumets like Alexander the great or Akbar the great be wp:OSE? Anyway if you explain kindly explain I would vote pro-Mahatma. I am putting the support vote, in anticipation of a convincing argument.Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)- My proposal is towards the very basic intention of an "article title" - which is the easiest and comprehensive identification of the subject. I feel that "Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi" doesn't serve this purpose any well better than what i proposed. I do not have more arguments than what i have already expressed. cheers! Arjuncodename024 06:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
You have introduced ambiguity, as the proposer, you should have specified one title and not a palette of choices, that could go against the proposal, please refine if it isn't too late, I had ab initio put vote on Mahatma Gandhi the most common way the subject of the article is referred.Yogesh Khandke (talk) 11:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)- Yogesh, feel free to strike down my proposal and refine it yourself. Arjuncodename024 13:09, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sadly, I am disappointed in your vote, Yogesh Khandke. You are not being true to your own principles. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Remember the pariah? Well his principles were utilitarian, which is my inspiration here.Yogesh Khandke (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- My proposal is towards the very basic intention of an "article title" - which is the easiest and comprehensive identification of the subject. I feel that "Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi" doesn't serve this purpose any well better than what i proposed. I do not have more arguments than what i have already expressed. cheers! Arjuncodename024 06:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk Back[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Indian Chronicles (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 04:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Page moves[edit]
You'd done some clean up on moves before, can you take a look at them again (all Kerala places). The relevant discussion is at User talk:SpacemanSpiff#More moves. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
My moves[edit]
hi, Most of the languages spoken in Indian subcontinent are currently transliterated using IAST system, and this include Dravidian languages (Malayalam does have a system, which is the IAST). So, we can romanize Malayalam names using Sanskrit transliteration, and it has been so. (Rameez pp (talk) 12:18, 29 July 2011 (UTC))
- If IAST were the norm, Chavara would have been spelt as "Cavara". Your argument doesn't hold water. Arjuncodename024 13:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- But, they are according to the authentic ISO 15919
(Rameez pp (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC))
Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]
| Hi Arjun024,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
|---|
Talkback[edit]
Message added 14:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Mango[edit]
Why are you reverting the Etymology of Mango, The reference you give for Malayalam root is broken and suggest the with "probably". But the reference for Tamil root is clear. Don't revert it back, we are keeping both the root in this version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Servophbabu (talk • contribs) 05:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- Read (1988) Organiser, Volume 40([7]), page 252 - Quote: the name Mango came to English from Malayalam through Portuguese and not from Tamil. In Malayalam, Mango fruit is called Manga with a nasal ending sound. Tamils invariably call ripe Mango fruit as Mam Pazham.
- The origin of the word has also been widely miscredited to Tamil. take note.Arjuncodename024 07:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with you, but the word Manga in Malayalam is came from Tamil word Manga. All the Nouns in Malayalam is from Tamil only. That's why it is called derived language of Tamil and Sanskrit[1]. Also check Manipravalam. Hence, it is not Miss credited, the root of the word Mango is Magai(Tamil)->Manga(Malayalam)->Magey(European langauage) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Servophbabu (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have cleared the citation for Malayalam word by keeping your reference. And There are reference to Tamil origin too so don't revert it now. And you should see the Dravidian language family tree, The Malayalam is not from Proto-Dravidian as you think. The fact is, it is from Tamil-Kodugu branch or Proto-Tamil. And one more thing Dravida means Tamil's. The word dravida itself refer's Tamils. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Servophbabu (talk • contribs) 04:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest[edit]
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.
As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.
If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.
You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.
ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)
Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of P. C. Thomas (professor) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P. C. Thomas (professor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. C. Thomas (professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 155blue (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Tathva.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Tathva.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Arjun024. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject Kerala[edit]
Namaskaram, Arjun024. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, Wikiproject Kerala hasn't a newsletter yet. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tathva logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Tathva logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- ^ Malayalam, R. E. Asher, T. C. Kumari, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-02242-8, 1997