User talk:Almighty059

This is Almighty059's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice Jacobsen (October 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.urbanremainschicago.com/finely-crafted-original-and-signed-american-zani-freestanding-ceramic-sculpture-depicting-a-chicago-graystone-residence.html, https://picclick.com/RARE-Alice-Zani-Jacobsen-Old-Chicago-Relief-122276771143.html, https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/alice-zani-jacobsen-chicago-relief-1832858413. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Alice Jacobsen may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Almighty059! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created two similar articles on accident. How do I delete one of them. I would prefer to delete the original one made and keep the second one I created. Almighty059 (talk) 21:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice "Zani" Jacobsen (October 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Alice Jacobsen, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alice "Zani" Jacobsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alice Jacobsen has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alice Jacobsen. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I read the comment and removed what you told me to. Should I resubmit it now? Almighty059 (talk) 17:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alice Jacobsen has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alice Jacobsen. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alice Jacobsen has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alice Jacobsen. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now about the comment about her "memory will forever live on through her artwork". Everything needs to be fact based and unbiased and that comment is an opinion. I think that is the only one like that but I will read over it to make sure.

As for the unsourced sections that you referred to that's what I am confused about. In my original submission I cited articles word-for-word and then referenced it with a citation. Then I was flagged for copyright issues but I only did so because I thought as long as I referenced my source it was okay. When I was flagged it said to use my own words which I remembered was the correct way to use a reference which is to rewrite everything I learned from the reference but in my own words and if I use anything word-for-word I quote it but that should be kept to a minimum, I went back and rewrote it and did that.

The other thing that confused me was that the original copyright flag citied websites that had in fact copyrighted the content themselves. For example, the copyright issues referenced three websites that had all copied their information from a Chicago Tribune article (which I referenced) as well as her obituary in the Chicago Tribune (which I referenced). I didn't know what to do in that case but I think rewriting everything in my own words as mentioned above fixed that.

My main question is if each section has some type of information from the referenced Chicago Tribune article should I reference the article at the end of each section or is referencing it once okay? And if a section is referenced from two sources should I reference both of them together at the end of each section? And due to the subjects age most of the information is no longer available which is why the Wiki page is so important. A lot of the referenced information comes from things I learned years ago from old newspaper and magazine articles. The Elmhurst Press, The Bugle, NSG News, The Citizen, and other publications are no longer in print or available online but I do have physical copies of them that were cut out as clippings from the publications. Is it okay to cite those publications? I was worried since it would be something that Wiki can't verify unless I can upload the articles. Almighty059 (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind my copying your message above to Draft talk:Alice Jacobsen; I've responded to it there. -- Hoary (talk) 11:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alice Jacobsen has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alice Jacobsen. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice Jacobsen (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they pass WP:NARTIST?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alice Jacobsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete[edit]

Delete the Availability section. It can be seen as promoting of the artist's work. David notMD (talk) 06:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cece Bke[edit]

Hello, Almighty059. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cece Bke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alice "Zani" Jacobsen[edit]

Hello, Almighty059. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alice "Zani" Jacobsen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alice "Zani" Jacobsen[edit]

Hello, Almighty059. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alice "Zani" Jacobsen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete it. Almighty059 (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cece BKE[edit]

Hello, Almighty059. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cece BKE".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]