User talk:Alexander Davronov

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2021/February; 2021/March; 2021/April; 2021/May; 2021/June; 2021/July; 2021/August; 2021/September; 2021/October; 2021/November; 2021/December; 2022/January; 2022/February; 2022/May; 2022/June; 2022/July; 2022/August; 2022/November; 2023/January; 2023/February;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

WARNING: On February 24, 2022 Putin's regime has cowardly declared a war on Ukraine disguised innocently as a «military operation» which I do not support. On September 21, 2022 the regime has announced mobilization due to several Ukranian counteroffensives. Given that I'm potential subject for conscription into Russian army you may find it necessary to check whether I'm still active or not. If you don't see a {{retired}} tag at the top and I'm not active for more than a year, I've probably got drafted into Russian army.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

This user is a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians.

The motto of the AIW is conservata veritate, which translates to "with the preserved truth".
This motto reflects the inclusionist desire to change Wikipedia only when no knowledge would be lost as a result.

Forbes[edit]

You used this as a source which was written by a Forbes contributor, see WP:FORBESCON for additional information. I am not sure if this author in particular can be considered a subject-level expert, but I think it should not be attributed to Forbes and preferably a different source should be used. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also he cannot be referred to as a "Forbes journalist". Contributors for Forbes are not their journalists. It seems his area of expertise is economics so probably it would be considered a self-published unreliable source and best removed. Mellk (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HOOPS Visualize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Copper(II) sulfate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electrodeposition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ngspice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OSDI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Niacin[edit]

Why did you add a See also - Benzoic acid to the Niacin article? David notMD (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Though functionally-unrelated they are structurally very similar differing only by one atom. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 10:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]