User:ZLEA/Requests for bureaucratship/ZLEA
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for bureaucratship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Final (2/2/1); ended 00:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC) - Closed by (non-admin closure) {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk)
ZLEA[edit]
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (?/?/?); Scheduled to end 23:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination[edit]
ZLEA (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) – I've been active on and off in the Wikipedia community for the past 3 years. It is a privilege, no, an honor for me to announce my candidacy for the office of Bureaucrat of the English Wikipedia. If I am elected, I promise to do the following:
- Authorize the development of thirty-eight new vandal-fighting ClueBots.
- Replace the current dispute resolution system with a giant thunderdome, where disputes can be resolved in a civilized yet entertaining manner.
- Restore everyone's Jimbo given right to eat.
- Establish the United Wikipedians organization to prevent edit wars.
- Build a firewall to prevent vandals from entering our great encyclopedia.
- End corruption.
- Provide additional funding to change the lightbulb. ZLEA (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate[edit]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as a bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?
- A:
- 2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?
- A:
- 3. Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?
- A:
- Additional question from Can I Log In
- 4. Can you confirm this is a SERIOUS RfB and not a joke.
- 5. Is this RfA in anyway intended to replicate last year's RfA which began April 1st.
Discussion[edit]
- Links for ZLEA: ZLEA (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for ZLEA can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Support[edit]
- Hey, this is swag, bro. Super cool thug man, 20:00 April 1 (UTC)
- You are my bestie 4 life! BFFunicorngirl 14:37 April 1 (UTC)
Oppose[edit]
- Oppose. subtract a letter, and then we can talk. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose: This is stupid.
{{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 15:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Neutral[edit]
- Placeholder Neutral - I'll review this again at 12:01am on 2nd April. Foxnpichu (talk) 17:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
General comments[edit]
- This RfB was made by a crook! GoodCrossing (talk) 19:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above bureaucratship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.