User talk:MrOllie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:MrOllie)

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Help fixing a hat note.[edit]

Eschatology - I'm just not sure what's wrong. (talk) 15:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grouping tag was just in the wrong place, I've fixed it. MrOllie (talk) 15:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your reversion of my well-sourced contributions to EMDR article[edit]

We need sources that meet WP:MEDRS for such things, these clearly do not

Did you look at my sources? One of them was the peer-reviewed medical journal Traumatology (journal), which clearly meets WP:MEDRS. My edits also made no direct claims about biomedical information, only about scientific evidence and debate. The other three sources are all reliable sources on such topics.

I'm genuinely curious: Do you believe that all those sources are wrong? Do you believe that what I wrote is factually incorrect? Do you think my changes made the article worse in some way? Do you think the existing introduction is a fair and neutral representation of the scientific consensus about EMDR? GreatBigCircles (talk) 21:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You should read WP:MEDRS thoroughly. Many articles in peer-reviewed journals do not meet that standard - the one you cited certainly does not. I do indeed think that your edit made the article worse, that is why I reverted. I decline to discuss my personal beliefs as I do not find such discussion to be helpful or relevant to writing an encyclopedia article. Direct any follow-up to the article's talk page, where discussion like this belongs. MrOllie (talk) 21:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your reversion of my well-sourced contributions to streaming platform article(s)[edit]

Did you look at my sources? Do you believe that all those sources are wrong? Do you believe that what I wrote is factually incorrect? For what reason do you believe a relevant kids streaming network with 50 million users should be omitted from an encyclopedia article? Bubalina (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your article was deleted (by someone else, not me) as blatant promotion. I removed it from the lists and such you had added it to, as they are places to list things that have Wikipedia articles. MrOllie (talk) 19:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not cite spamming[edit]

We are not citespamming we are making contributions in various fields of tourism - korstaanje is a ref in the fiel like many others — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been citespamming and evading blocks with sockpuppet accounts for years. Just stop. MrOllie (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]