This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
In addition to saints, I am planning to use this stub for articles about venerables and beatified people. Does anyone have a problem with this? --Eoghanacht 21:08, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
There is a saint-stub.
It is used in many countries.
And as you know the Christianity was divided about 1000 year ago.
And the saint-stub uses the icon of Francisk from Assisi.
But he is not a saint for some Churches.
Therefore we need (in that stub) to use a saint that are accepted in all Churches.
Then he must be from time before 1000.
I suggest the Saint George.
What do you say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.25.120.81 (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see your point. Personally I'd prefer the image that the portal, navbox, and (in a slightly different version) the project template use, namely: File:Gloriole blur.svg. That would be consistent, visually appealing (unlike rendering any face at a very low resolution), and neural (all major Churches use halos to represent saints, and a halo alone represents no particular saint; the visual tradition dates back to early Christianity). The lead image of the article Saint also features halos. That association is strong. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
