Template talk:Brahmic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconWriting systems Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.


  • Steven Roger Fischer, History of Writing Systems, table on p. 107. Google books link. This turned out to contain lots of errors
  • Masica, The Indo-Aryan Languages, pp. 143ff. Google books link
  • Please add more information, corrections, as long as you have the sources.

Template too large[edit]

IMO this template is too large. Perhaps it makes more sense to add the family tree to Brahmic family, and replace this with a smaller, horizontal navigational box (or perhaps just leave it at the 'writing systems' navigational box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joost (talkcontribs) 12:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please correct the tree[edit]

Oriya language or script is a descendant of Brahmi script but not a descendant of Proto-Bengali script, please see the following categorization which says that Kalinga script is the precursor of modern Oriya script. [1] ସୁଭ ପା/Subhashish Panigrahi 16:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psubhashish (talkcontribs)

As far as I know, Oriya is a northern script, not a southern one. Oriya has a much closer relationship with Bengali and Devanagari, rather than Telugu or any other southern script. The Wikipedia article says the same. This mistake should be corrected. http://wiki.alquds.edu/?query=Oriya_alphabet#Comparison_of_O.E1.B9.9Biy.C4.81_script_with_its_neighbours (talk) 07:47, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unicode 11[edit]

Three new Brahmic scripts were added with Unicode 11.0:

They should probably be added to this template but I'm not completely sure where in the tree they go. Does anyone know? Thanks. DRMcCreedy (talk) 04:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]