Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
- 142.120.168.142 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Repeatedly deleting lots of well-written properly cited content from the same page, creating additional accounts to do the same despite multiple reverts for vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:B100:D4D:35F8:C563:D2C9:6157:BFFF (talk) 02:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- 2405:4802:7174:F2A0:5128:E090:B410:2413 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 02:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Loriebuenviaje (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) – Vandalism past final warning. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 02:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Ivby official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- - DirtyDany69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Nathan.sucks123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "sucks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
User-reported
- WBBBIYAHABURCO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a username that implies shared use. Per Google Translate, "wakaalada biyaha burco" is "Burco Water Agency" I'm not sure where the "WBB" comes form but "BIYAHA BURCO" seems to translate to "burco water" or something similar.
PhantomTech[talk]08:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)- Note: User is in the categories: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices, Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 12:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- The WBB is probably from "Wakaalada Biyaha Burco"
PhantomTech[talk]08:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 
Being discussed with the user. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Pr & Marketing World (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Ruy (talk) 17:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Note: I can't even tell you how ready I was to block this account. However, I don't see any direct evidence that the name represents a real organization. I did explaing to them that if there goal is aligned with their name they should drop it right now. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- MinnesotaLawComm (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. Princess Persnickety (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 19:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- YouGottaHuckleberryHoundThatShit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. "Shit" is on the Blacklist and I doubt that this new editor is from India. Also "Huckleberry Hound" is a pejorative term for a black male with an under bite.. Blue Riband► 18:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Personally I don't think this rises to the level of a zero-edit block ("Huckleberry Hound" also refers to... Huckleberry Hound, and some users just don't know that profanity isn't allowed), but I won't object if someone else blocks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 19:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tamzin - Another admin told me to wait until a user edits but is there a threshold for offensive Usernames to trigger a zero-edit block? In this case "shit" is on the block list and the Urban Dictionary defines "Huckleberry Hound" as a black male with an under bite. A choice of a user name containing two disruptive terms looks like a NOTHERE. Blue Riband► 19:36, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Blue Riband: I'm sure Urban Dictionary says that... It says a lot of things. "Huckleberry Hound" primarily, however, refers to a cartoon character. So really we're left with a username containing "shit" but not directed at anyone, which I generally don't see as grounds for a zero-edit block. See User:Beeblebrox/rough guide to username blocks for some discussion of the nuances of zero-edit blocks. Basically the question is if you can infer disruptive intent from the username alone. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tamzin - thanks for the link and I've bookmarked it for reference. I think what we have here is a borderline case. I'm seeing the Username as an intentional scatalogical reference by somebody not here in good faith while others see it as an unintended choice of words by a newbee. Blue Riband► 21:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Blue Riband: I'm sure Urban Dictionary says that... It says a lot of things. "Huckleberry Hound" primarily, however, refers to a cartoon character. So really we're left with a username containing "shit" but not directed at anyone, which I generally don't see as grounds for a zero-edit block. See User:Beeblebrox/rough guide to username blocks for some discussion of the nuances of zero-edit blocks. Basically the question is if you can infer disruptive intent from the username alone. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tamzin - Another admin told me to wait until a user edits but is there a threshold for offensive Usernames to trigger a zero-edit block? In this case "shit" is on the block list and the Urban Dictionary defines "Huckleberry Hound" as a black male with an under bite. A choice of a user name containing two disruptive terms looks like a NOTHERE. Blue Riband► 19:36, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Personally I don't think this rises to the level of a zero-edit block ("Huckleberry Hound" also refers to... Huckleberry Hound, and some users just don't know that profanity isn't allowed), but I won't object if someone else blocks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 19:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. 
Note: I can't even tell you how ready I was to block this account. However, I don't see any direct evidence that the name represents a real organization. I did explaing to them that if there goal is aligned with their name
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Talk:Marjorie Taylor Greene
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent WP:NOTFORUM/WP:BLP violations by IPs and non-autos. Semi-protection of this talk page in the past has markedly lowered disruption. It demonstrably works, and is needed again. Curbon7 (talk) 04:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Curbon7, of course it works; that isn't the issue with talk page protections. The low impact on readers and the low frequency of such contributions need to be considered. The previous protection was in response to severe BLP violations which have not reoccurred during the last three months of non-protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Not done for the bot to auto-archive. Best, 2022 Durand Cup group stage
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Few individuals continue to edit even after requesting not to do so. Debankan talk 10:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Note: : Debankan Mullick, this unfortunately is a typical Cup or League protection request — no one can tell what's happening. El_C 19:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Note: : Babajide Sanwo-Olu
Reason: Disruptive editing by new users. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: I'll pass on this one. Looks like the non auto confirmed are removing negative WP:BLP. There should probably be a discussion about adding it back. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Or-- I hate getting letters from attorneys. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- I've reverted my edit where I added the content back. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Or-- I hate getting letters from attorneys. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Killing of Jayland Walker
Reason: Frequent disruptive editing on the page. Semi-protecting it for at least 3 months would help prevent IP vandalism and disruption. Screendeemer (talk) 20:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)- Note: I hve like zero tokernce or personl ttcks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
The Other Side: The Secret Relationship Between Nazism and Zionism
- The Other Side: The Secret Relationship Between Nazism and Zionism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 22:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC) 22:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Mifter (talk) 02:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Harriet Hageman
Temporary full protection: Repeated re-creation contrary to this AfD discussion which reached a consensus to redirect. That discussion determined the page can be created if she wins the general election in November. It can be created earlier if there is a consensus, but people need to use the talk page. ― Tartan357 Talk 23:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Electronic harassment
Reason: Semi-protection for at least a month. Disruptive edits primarily from IPs. Screendeemer (talk) 23:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Kevin Samuels
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
Sayed Noorullah Jalili
Reason: I was the one that initially made the article. The article was protected due to repeated creation by me and sockpuppets which I created. After a long unblock journey and learning to become a better member on wikipedia, I was unblocked and I would like the article to now be unprotected so that I can publish a new and viable draft for review and work towards the article being published on the live space. I am not a paid editor but I do have a conflict of interest to the subject of the article. I have declared that conflict of interest. Nonetheless, I have written a valid draft and eliminated the unambiguous advertising and biased material. Still, the article needs to be published for review and therefore this page needs to be unprotected in order for me to submit the article again under the name of the protected page. I am requesting the assistance of the admins in unprotecting, reviewing and improving, and publishing the article.
Thank you, SJYTMAIN (talk) 13:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just so I understand you, which sockpuppets are you referring to? Need to know to get the full picture before considering the request. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Dennis Brown: As far as I can tell, they used these accounts to repeatedly create that page (plus maybe SayedIJ123 (talk · contribs), though that one was never blocked). Considering that they were only unblocked fairly recently, and that promotional editing on that page was the reason for the initial block, I don't think them continuing to try and recreate the article is a good idea. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- As unblocking admin, might I say, "ABSOLUTELY NOT." Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Dennis Brown: As far as I can tell, they used these accounts to repeatedly create that page (plus maybe SayedIJ123 (talk · contribs), though that one was never blocked). Considering that they were only unblocked fairly recently, and that promotional editing on that page was the reason for the initial block, I don't think them continuing to try and recreate the article is a good idea. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- I figured as much, just fishing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Declined - Editor can always create an article in their sandbox and submit that draft to be approved. Having this unprotected doesn't prevent that work. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Declined - Editor can always create an article in their sandbox and submit that draft to be approved. Having this unprotected doesn't prevent that work. Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
Mark Zuckerberg
Please shorten and add dates per short description, see like this:
{{Short description|American internet entrepreneur (born 1984)}} 112.204.221.155 (talk) 12:47, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Not done I see the talk page is protected. I am fairly sure that edit wouldn't be in consensus with other editors active on the page, as it deletes the fact that he founded Facebook, the thing he is best known for. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 6 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
| 3 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
AutopatrolledUser:Curbon7
User:Curbon7 has created 81 articles, of which 7 have been deleted. Of these, two were deleted to make way for a page move (G6) and three were G7'd. The other two deserve a bit more of an explanation. Alexander Mamasidikov was deleted per WP:G5, which I would guess is because he lost control of his account around that time. Currently, he has the 2FA tester group, which I assume he makes use of. Finally, there is William J. Meade. He created the page, but later realized that the subject did not meet GNG. He was able to recognize that G7 was not applicable, so he PROD'd his own creation. Someone dePROD'd the page, so he took himself to AfD. In sum, I do not believe he needs new page patrollers to look after his work, because he looks after himself. HouseBlastertalk 21:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Beodizia
Hi Folks!! I think this editor should be autopatrolled. Please take a look at this article: Lea Niako and this: Domna Visvizi. The editor has only been here two months odd with only 600odd edits and 15 articles already. I'm not sure exactly what the criteria is, so I guess this is a kind of speculative application, but some workload. scope_creepTalk 16:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Guinness323
Created over 100 articles. None have been deleted, and new articles do not appear to require attention from New Pages Patrol. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:10, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
User:A loose necktie
OK, I have written exactly 100 articles so far, 17 having since been deleted, which I think is a pretty good track record. I believe I have shown I have a good sense of Wikipedia's policies regarding notability, copyright, and verifiability, and while I realize this "right" doesn't really "change" anything for me, I don't see much point in burdening the new page patrollers with my work (though I do enjoy the idea of someone having to read over each of the articles I write! But that is just an ego need and I am letting that go). A loose necktie (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Locomotive207
Created over 200 articles. None have been deleted, and new creations do not appear to require attention from New Page Patrol. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
User:AK965
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights AK965 (talk) 03:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Aoidh
|
Done
Automated comment This user has created roughly 15 
Not done| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
ConfirmedUser:Zippybonzo (public)
LEGITSOCK of Zippybonzo - I will sign below as proof - please also add Extended Confirmed. Thanks, Zippybonzo (public) (talk) 15:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewerUser:VersaceSpace
I think I would make a good new page reviewer. I have a lot of experience in content creation, AfD, a light CSD log, and I've also dedicated a lot of time to content improvement (see Hot Pink and "WAP"). I could carry this over to NPR and I'd love to help make a dent in the backlog. Thanks :) —VersaceSpace 🌃 15:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
User:0xDeadbeef
I am an AfC reviewer and I would like to reduce the NPP backlog. I have a fair bit of experience in both AfD and CSD. 0xDeadbeef 16:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC) User:Spudlace
After creating several articles I asked for and was given the NPP perm temporarily. I didn't use it very much and allowed it to expire. I recently heard there was a very high backlog and wanted to give it another go. Spudlace (talk) 21:18, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
After this discussion, I think I'll just see how things go at AFC for now and apply for NPP again at a later time. This has definitely been a valuable exchange with good input for me. Spudlace (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
User:TheChunky
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I want to review new pages and will try my best to clear the backlog to the best of my capacity. I was granted a temporary right. After that, I reviewed many articles. Now I want to again get the right so that I can start the process of clearing the backlog. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 01:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC) User:Matthewrb
I was previously granted the right on a provisional basis and would like to make it permanent. I really enjoy NPP work, and would like to keep doing it. A manual log of my work is available. ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 23:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
User:ReVeluv02
I have sufficient experience in editing, writing, and publishing articles or pages here in Wikipedia. I've been an active user since January 2, 2020 and made about 6000+ overall edits already based from the. I'm keen on writing information regarding various articles or pages on Wikipedia. With that said, I also make sure to be in line with the guidelines given by Wikipedia in creating, editing, publishing, and writing Wikipedia articles or pages. ReVeluv02 (talk) 05:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
|
Request withdrawn by requester (adding the template for the bot). Thanks, | Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page moverUser:NotReallySoroka
I already have some RM participation experience, especially with closing them. If I were to have this right, I would then be able to participate in the RMTR area (where page movers are needed to execute some moves) or with editnotices. Thanks, NotReallySoroka (talk) 07:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Nirmaljoshi
To manage stubs and dirty redirects. nirmal (talk) 04:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC) User:Trailblazer101
I am an active editor of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) articles and have been working on several redirects related to them, and have worked on a few disambiguation pages. I frequently encounter the need to move some MCU articles for title changes (sometimes to revert vandalism), with many drafts necessitating moves from their initial Untitled states to officially titled ones (though many have beaten me to them in the past), moving to a more acceptable titling format (history example), and the drafts having to be moved to mainspace once filming starts per WP:NFTV. I comply with the guidelines at WP:AT, and have an understanding of when to use WP:NATURALDAB, which prefers natural disambiguations over parenthetical disambiguations, for Rogue One or Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery (which I made Glass onion (disambiguation) to help with navigation for). In the past I did make an erroneous undiscussed move at Draft:Blade (2023 film) but I learned from that mistake as it was a poor jumping of the gun on a minor italics formatting choice. I also was among those who suggested in the WP:MCU task force (before it was anything official) the naming conventions for the Phase articles such as Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four being the title for that article over others discussed such as the more unambiguous and yet still helpful titles Phase Four (Marvel Cinematic Universe) and Phase Four of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which were natural disambiguations but not decent disambiguations in their own right as the former's format is generally used for in-universe characters or elements, while the latter's read more as a sentence, so a compromise in the titling format I helped suggest was agreed upon. I also did recently move Secret Wars (film) to Secret Wars (2014 film) given Avengers: Secret Wars was just recently announced and that 2014 film needed to have further specification as the common name for the Avengers film would lie at Secret Wars (2025 film), even though that would not be the main article title. Trailblazer101 (talk) 07:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC) User:KingSkyLord
I have a long history with moving pages, participating in move discussions, and making requests in the technical requests section. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 02:12, 4 August 2022 (UTC) User:MrsSnoozyTurtle
Hello, I would like to apply for Page Mover rights please. It is for moving new articles to draftspace if they are not ready for publication. Someone suggested that I apply for this right. I am quite experienced with page moves and this should avoid the need for an admin to manually delete the redirects that are currently being created. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:52, 14 August 2022 (UTC) User:Wjemather
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewerUser:Endrabcwizart
Hello, I am reapplying for this role. I did it some time ago. I am applying at this time as I believe that my extensive experience editing Wikipedia makes me qualified for this role. I am much familiar with Wikipedia BLP, Neutral Point of View, and other policies this time. Thanks Endrabcwizart (talk) 12:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC) User:PlanetJuice
Most of my wiki activity is related to counter-vandalism and improving needy edits, so I'm requesting the user right in order to review pending changes that I come across while patrolling recent changes and to generally help out with the pending changes queue when I have time. I have read WP:RPC in its entirety and understand the pending changes review process, as well as the basics of the policies linked in that guideline. Thanks for your consideration. PlanetJuice (talk • contribs) 01:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC) User:Jaireeodell
I am a regular contributor to Wikipedia and familiar with the policies related to reviewer rights. I would like to review pending changes to entries related the projects I am active in, including WikiProject Indiana and WikiProject Women in Religion. Jaireeodell (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC) User:Mr.weedle
Team, been loving being back on Wikipedia and protecting our Wiki from vandals. I've noted the high backlog of pending changes, and would like to extend my hand to assist reviewing (when not busy hunting vandals!). I believe I have largely used my rollback permissions with good care, and would like to assist further. Poped in before but previous admin wanted a bit more track record since being back on. Thanks! Mr.weedle (talk) 04:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Helloheart
I work a lot in the field of vandalism, and I see some vandalism happening in the pending changes section of articles and I would like to correct the vandalism. I also feel that a lot of pending changes happen and that they are not checked fast enough. 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 👋❤️ (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔🤔) 01:26, 7 August 2022 (UTC) User:Partofthemachine
I've been editing Wikipedia for multiple years now and have over 2,000 edits. I also frequent Special:RecentChanges and have a good understanding of what constitutes constructive and unconstructive editing. Having pending changes reviewer rights would allow me to make a more positive contribution to the community. Partofthemachine (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC) User:SamuelRiv
I asked for protections to be lifted on Aztecs, but they were only lowered. It is on my Watchlist and I would like to expedite and modify useful edits such as these. I will use the powers for good and not for evil etc. SamuelRiv (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC) User:Nirmaljoshi
Requesting permission to expedite the reviewing process for new users. Best! nirmal (talk) 02:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC) User:Phil81194
I am a regular contributor to Wikipedia, so I believe that my extensive experience editing Wikipedia makes me qualified for this role. Phil81194 (talk) 10:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC) User:Geopony
Hello, I am applying for this role. I am fairly active on Wikipedia and have a history of constructive, timely, well-sourced edits. Geopony (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC) User:Majokthefirst
I request for these rights as I have for a long time read, understood and practiced Wikipedia policies related to the role. I am a regular contributor (mostly on articles related to South Sudan) and an active member of WikiProject Podcasting. Majokthefirst (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
RollbackUser:Heyallkatehere
Reason for requesting rollback rights I've got 260+ mainspace edits, am a regular to recent changes, and I'd like to think I'm a good judge of vandalism. Heyallkatehere (talk) 23:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
User:JML1148
I would like rollback as I have done anti-vandalism work for some time now, and would like rollback as a useful tool, and to use Huggle. JML1148 (talk) 10:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Skipple
Currently enrolled within the WP:CVUA. I have been attempting to patrol the recent changes more and more and would like to experiment with using Huggle. Requesting access to utilize that tool. Skipple ☎ 02:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Izivy
Hello, I already have over 200 mainspace edits, I also reverted edits from vandals and warned them using Twinkle and RedWarn. So is this the time for rollback? If you cannot grant that, that is fine. Of course you may not grant that because I have a level-3 warning... but will you still grant that? Izivy (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
So you just want me to quit wikipedia or to remove my account? Izivy (talk) 14:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC) I worked so hard editing wikipedia, and you want me to... remove my account? That is not possible, what kind of nonsense discussion is this? Izivy (talk) 14:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC) @Guerillero, Thank you for making my manager mad after you declined the rollback request. Now I have to pay them $600. "What do you mean you have a manager, a manager for what?" I meant a manager to work on Wikipedia. Izivy (talk) 15:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC) User:Kaustubhkul
I've got 100+ mainspace edits, am a regular to recent changes, and I'd like to think I'm a good judge of vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaustubhkul (talk • contribs) 16:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
User:BerkBerk68
Hello, I've been actively struggling against vandalism in recent weeks. I believe that I am ready to use the rollbacking tool for my anti-vandalism work, so I thought that it would be appropriate to apply for that. Regards, BerkBerk68 22:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC) User:YeYen KY
i might need this right for clearer edit of the return. YeYen KY (talk) 01:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
|
Template documentationUsage
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |