Template:Admin dashboard

Permanently protected template
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 84
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 93
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 37
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 3
Requested RD1 redactions 8
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 3
Candidates for speedy deletion 4
Open sockpuppet investigations 49
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 0
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 7
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – 2-day backlog (oldest)
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 8 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 66 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 8 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Salman Al-Faraj

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Please use AIV for issues with single IPs; that IP hasn't even been warned yet. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Salem Al-Dawsari

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:18, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Princess Connect! Re:Dive

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tropicalkitty (talk) 15:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Kizuna no Allele

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after unprotection. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2001:4451::/32 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Favonian (talk) 17:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Halanna Capri

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three IPs from the same subnet have been persistently removing the AFD notice from Halanna Capri. It's the fifth day of an AFD, so should only need a few more days. Wikishovel (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Phyllis B. Acosta

Reason: Persistant vandalism, someone saying that they are the daughter. I doubt this very much, when they remove much material. Catfurball (talk) 16:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Liver King

Reason: Persistent BLP violations. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

James Stephanie Sterling

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Requesting pending changes protection; article was recently targeted by a infobox-tampering vandal, and is fairly frequently vandalized due to the subject's gender identity. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

British School of Amsterdam

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and ongoing vandalism by IPs and newly registered users - going back to at least the start of this year. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Azees Nedumangad

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – non notable Relatives names added in infobox, even after multiple reverts. Aadirulez8 (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Only post below if you receive no (favourable) reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2023-09-21 21:55 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Peppers (request) 2023-10-02 15:31 Fully protected (log) Protected by Hall Monitor on 2006-02-13: "protecting page, this is a closed discussion"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
2 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Tennis events nav (request) 2023-09-29 10:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2015-07-13: "Highly visible Lua module"
Template:Connected contributor (request) 2023-10-02 11:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 13:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

WP:PERM

There are no outstanding requests for account creator.

Account creator

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

User:GMH Melbourne

I have created around 50 pages thus far, haven't had any issues with them being reviewed except for a few early on when I was still getting the grasp of things. I'm an NPR and understand which pages that qualify for deletion and which are fine for wikipedia. I intend to make a lot of new pages regarding Australian Government Ministries over the next few months and thought I'd get this permission to ease the backlog of unreviewed pages. ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 00:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done, thank you for your contributions so far. – Joe (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Sandstein

Created hundreds of articles, new creations do not appear to require attention from NPP. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

  • Sandstein is an admin - he can grant himself autopatrolled if he wants. If he hasn't done so this far, I assume that he either has a reason for it, or simply wasn't aware that it was unbundled from the admin toolkit. I've pinged him, so he should be aware now. Closing as  Not done procedurally although I have no objection to him self-granting the right. Spicy (talk) 23:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
    Sandstein, please say if you'd rather someone else ticks the box than you doing it yourself. Schwede66 01:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks for the ping, I wasn't aware that it would be helpful for others for me to be autopatrolled. Please do tick the box for me. Sandstein 07:26, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 Done Schwede66 08:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Booberring

I have created a number of articles and I will continue creating more articles. I'm aware that having this right does not give any special tool to ease page creation process but will help in reducing the tedious work of new page reviewers. Booberring (talk) 10:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done, excellent work so far, thank you. – Joe (talk) 13:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Kyle4344

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

I have created over 50 new pages, and have updated content in many more. My primary interest over the past year has been motorsports, particularly hall of fame level race drivers from the northeastern U.S. My goal is to create stubs that comply with Wikipedia notability standards, so that other users familiar with motorsports have a starting point. As such, my work tends to be non-controversial and succinct, with little need to burden NPP. Kyle4344 (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


User:Happyecheveria

I have been working with categories more, and would like to see how the AWB could be helpful. Happyecheveria (talk) 22:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

I'll leave this for another admin, but am inclined to decline - given User talk:Happyecheveria#Category edits I think it's probably not prudent to grant you access to automated tools that would speed up your editing at this time. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Perspicax

I have noticed that the eponymous article for university categories is often either missing (eg several in Category:Wikipedia categories named after universities and colleges in China have no articles at the top level) or incorrectly sorted (eg in Category:University of La Laguna) and wish to use AWB with a suitable module to correct this easily. Perspicax (talk) 22:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Leaving for a second opinion, but given that you've only recently had a talk page complaint about insufficient care in using automated tools I'm not convinced it's prudent to grant you access to additional automated tools at this time. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Remsense

Among other aspects, I find myself editing a lot of template-heavy articles and I think AWB would really improve my speed and consistency with such, e.g. foreign language-heavy articles, computing articles, math articles. Remsense (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Could you explain what exactly you want to do with AWB? AWB is for editing multiple articles in quick succession, not really for editing template-heavy articles. I took a quick look through your contributions and don't see any mass changes of that sort. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
For example, I semi-manually wrangle a lot of Chinese-language text, and it would be nice for me to format it properly across multiple related articles I'm working on, rather than slowly moving from one to other. For example, I often find myself looking at a group like Chinese characters, CJK ideographs and, say, Qiao Shi. Using regex, it would be a lot more efficient to clean up the same regular discrepancies with language templates and formatting across several articles at once so I can more quickly go on to actually augmenting the respective articles' content rather than iterating through similar regexes single pages at a time, reshuffling what's already there. I hope that makes sense? Remsense (talk) 04:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Works for me.  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Tanline666

I would like to edit pages like 1904, where instead of it saying "b. 1854" or something like that, it says "born 1854". It sticks out like a sore thumb, and I really do not want to manually edit every single instance of this. It would also be useful in other areas involving similar repetitive edits. Tanline666 (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done Fails minimum criteria - not enough mainspace edits. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Suntooooth

I do a lot of adding coordinates to articles, and I'm curious if AWB can help speed that up a bit. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 08:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 20:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

User:The DK Baus

Reason for requesting confirmed rights

Would just like to see something regarding around him, and wouldn't want to do anything else The DK Baus (talk) 02:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

  •  Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! Cabayi (talk) 18:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

User:KingTheD

I have nearly 700 edits. KingTheD (talk) 04:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([2][3]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 04:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

User:Wikiexplorationandhelping

I have a measurable experience with RFDs, AFDs, as well as CSDs. I would be a good person to help review pages, as well as to help the backlogging that exists at the moment. Thanks, Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 16:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. There seem to have been issues with some of your recent(ish) mainspace creations which suggest that you're not quite up to speed with all the relevant policies and expectations for new articles. I would suggest building some more experience at AfC and AfD and writing some nice clean articles on notable subjects if that's something you're interested in, then reapplying in a couple of months or so. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you for the feedback. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

User:FatalFit

I was given temporary NPR until September 30, I'm requesting for my trial period to be extended or for the permission to not expire. Requesting early as I know requests take a while to be answered sometimes. Thank you! FatalFit | ✉   22:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Ingenuity (expires 00:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 23:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
@FatalFit can you give examples of where you've reviewed articles? I see a lot of redirects in your curation log but there's ,uch less to assess there than with an article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Mostly I wanted to help out with the very large redirect backlog but I've also reviewed some disambiguation pages and some articles I've reviewed are Detroit Bus Station, Amasia (supercontinent), Augustana (Illinois) Vikings football, Sam Gellaitry, Basira Paigham and Glasgow Transit. FatalFit | ✉   23:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Alpha3031

I've recently started participating again at AfC and AfD again in the past few months and I figured I can handle the more demanding workload. By my own estimate, in a month I probably won't review much more than a dozen, perhaps a score, but I thought I'd throw my hat in anyway. Alpha3031 (tc) 13:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done, thank you for volunteering and do as much or as little as you like – it all helps. – Joe (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:NotAGenious

With the increasing backlog (although drive is coming), some help probably wouldn't hurt. I've been working at counter-vandalism, help venues, dispute resolution, speedy deletion (some of those) and a bit at AFD and removing copyvios, and currently writing a few articles. I've went through all the instructions for the Curation Tool, the new page feed, the acceptance criteria and other guidance. I've understood everything, though if I'm unsure, I'll rather ask for help or leave it in the queue rather than review it myself. NotAGenious (talk) 11:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 409 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 12:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
@NotAGenious: I'm sorry, but you must have been a registered user for at least 90 days and have at least 500 undeleted mainspace edits to patrol new pages. Please feel free to reapply once you meet this and the other criteria.
 Not done. – Joe (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Hmm. Thanks. NotAGenious (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Cyberwolf434344

I have been working in csds for a while now and i want to contribute to the drive ~~~~ •Cyberwolf• 18:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done. As far as I can see, you've only written one article and haven't participated in any AfDs. A lot of your contributions have been removing content from articles with the summary "spam clean up", which isn't accurate much of the time; for example, here, you removed a section that was clearly not spam - instead of removing it, you could've converted the external links into references. Also, this isn't the kind of attitude I look for in a reviewer. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Voorts

I've been doing AFC for three months, have four GAs (one of which I hope is about to pass FAC), and have reviewed several GANs and FACs. I'm hoping to help out at NPP as well. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Oronsay

I am aware that there is a large backlog of articles awaiting review and would like to help reduce that number. I have mainly created articles about women, but also list articles for awards, years in Australian literature and Australian honours. I am happy if you choose to grant me temporary permission that can be reviewed later. Oronsay (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:GraziePrego

Would love to be involved in this process- I have made many mainspace content edits and participated in AFD. Very interested in helping with this month’s drive as well. GraziePrego (talk) 03:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for volunteering GraziePrego. I'm afraid we usually look for quite a bit more prior experience in deletion, AFC, and/or article creation before granting this right, though.  Not done for now, but please do consider requesting again after you've got more experience in those areas. – Joe (talk) 13:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Flurrious

Hello, I'm interested in helping with the October 2023 New Page Patrol Backlog Drive. Flurrious (talk) 00:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Flurrious. Thank you for offering to help with the backlog drive. The guidelines for granting this right ask for prior experience in AfD, AfC, and/or page creation, but it doesn't look like you've been active in any of those areas recently. I'm sorry but this doesn't give me any way of assessing your suitability for the role, so  Not done at this time. – Joe (talk) 14:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:FuzzyMagma

I have created 195 pages, 27 from them ended up in the mainpage as DYK, have 8 GA and 6 other under nomination, have reviewed couple of GA, and has one article being considered for FA. Sadly, I had 1 block in June for warring but since then I have completely changed my approche to dealing with difficult topics to extent of recieving a "The Barnstar of Integrity" from an admin just one week after this incident. the other block was done by mistake. I am also actively participating in Wikipedia:WikiProject Sudan and africa in general FuzzyMagma (talk) 08:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done for a one-month trial period. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Sciencefish

While I have only participated in a few AfDs, and have not created any pages myself, I'm interested in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia pages, which is hopefully demonstrated by my editing history. Sciencefish (talk) 14:19, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sciencefish. I've no doubt that you are, but as the guidelines for this right say, we really need to see prior experience in maintenance processes. So I'm afraid I have to say  Not done for now, but thank you for volunteering and do feel free to re-request if you spend some time at AfD, AfC, etc. first. – Joe (talk) 14:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Ratnahastin

I'm requesting this permission, so I can help in clearing the recent backlog (see October 2023 New Page Patrol Backlog Drive). So far I've reviewed 5-10 pages. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Macaddct1984

I was slightly more active monitoring new pages 10-15 years ago, but recently became aware of the large backlog in new pages and hoping to assist in the October drive. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 13:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover


User:Zippybonzo

My page mover trial is expiring in ~1 month and I’d like to have it extended indef so I can continue handling Requested Moves/Technical requests and it often helps with some of my NPP activities such as backlog drive coordination and draftifications. I was active for most of the start of my trial however I took a wiki break for a few reasons and holidaying but I’m back mostly active again. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 20:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 20:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I would note that @Zippybonzo is no longer involved in new pages patrol coordination as their request states. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
(non-admin comment) I would suggest another trial period to become more familiar with WP:PMR. The move log shows 11 uses of supressredirect so far. RM/TR show 22 edits, but 12 of them involved moving a request to "administrator needed" that actually only required a WP:ROUNDROBIN. And he could use some more RM experience to be better able to help at RM/TR. He has commented in 1 RM, closed 2, and relisted 9. SilverLocust 💬 09:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC) (original comment significantly shortened 05:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC))
I think another trial period would definitely be beneficial for me to gain more experience. Zippybonzo | talk to me | what have I done (he|she|they) 12:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 Done Cabayi (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:NmWTfs85lXusaybq

I'm asking for another trial or formal permission of page mover as my current trial will expire in the next week. I'm active in the whole trial period. I mainly use round-robin page moves to swap malplaced disambiguation pages. Moreover, delete-redirect is used to overwrite redirects left by mistaken page moves and tboverride is used to tag editnotices of unsalted deleted pages as G8 candidates. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 12:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Vanderwaalforces

I went through the WP:Page_mover#Guidelines_for_granting and saw that I am not qualified yet per criterion #1 and #2 but I took the courage to make this request after reading the last line which says An administrator may grant page mover rights to users they otherwise deem competent and may deny the requests if they do not see a need for the tools or have other concerns.

I have a log of draftification and I keep draftifying articles and leaving a redirect that is marked for deletion. I would love to help reduce that backlog by simply having the pagemover right. Thanks so much! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 51 days and has 2584 total edits. MusikBot talk 19:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

User:Cocobb8

Hello, For the past six months, I've been active in the Wikipedia community adding new content and creating articles, but especially fighting vandalism. I have also gained experience in reviewing by looking and reviewing semi-protected and protected pages edit requests. I am now looking for a new challenge, and I think I could help by putting forth my skills for the pending changes reviewer role! Thanks for the consideration, Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

User:History6042

I would like this permission because I have recently been active in recent changes and I think I could contribute to Wikipedia more with this permission. History6042 (talk) 13:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 13:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

User:Diverging Diamond

Alt account of rollbacker ClydeFranklin. Diverging Diamond To the left! To the right! 03:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Confirm. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 03:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 48 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 03:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
@ClydeFranklin/@Diverging Diamond why do you need rollback for an alt account? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
HJ Mitchell, to use semi-automated anti-vandal tools when I cannot access this account for whatever reason. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 22:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 Not done. I need a better explanation of what you are planning on doing with your alt and why you need it to have rollback. -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Cocobb8

Hello, for the past six months I've been active in the Wikipedia community, adding content, but especially fighting vandalism. That is what brings me here, as I am sure that with rollback I'd be able to prevent vandalism more effectively! I've been using Twinkle to remove vandalism as well, and would like to get access to AntiVandal and Huggle with those rights to fight vandalism even more. Thanks for the consideration, Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

User:FatCat96

I have been patrolling recent changes for some time now, and I would like to gain access to rollback so I can use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal to revert vandalism. FatCat96 (talk) 15:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Tedmcbur

I want to do counter-vandalism work. Teddythedev (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 14 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 18:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Anarchyte (talk) 14:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

User:RotciW

I recently started to use Huggle at read-only mode to search for vandalism and using RedWarn to revert it, I've also encountered and reverted vandalism while reviewing pending changes. RotciW 22:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done seems reasonable after looking at your contribs. Please make good choices while using huggle --Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Ratnahastin

I'm requesting rollbacker rights to fight off vandalism and other unconstructive edits, I've used Lupin's anti vandal tool in past two years, so i would like to have rollback rights to revert vandalism more efficiently. Also most of my automated edits have been reverts.[6]Ratnahastin (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Noneate

I have been active in new pages patrol and AFD before extending my contribution to Recent Changes to help counter vandalism. I have mostly used Twinkle tools but I understand that having rollback right will allow me to use other tools such as huggle and AntiVanda in spotting vandalism. Noneate (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:NoNAja

I'm using SWViewer to revert vandalism and want to use rollback to revert vandalism more efficiently. I already have rollback rights in the German Wikipedia. NoNAja (talk) 16:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 42 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 18:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

User:NoobThreePointOh

As of this day, I feel like I have now had sufficient editing experience. Most edits that I reverted have either been done through vandalism or in bad faith. Using Twinkle works well, but sometimes the rollback or vandalism revert buttons can become slow and useless. However, if I get this permission, reverting vandalism will become much easier. I will not misuse it while checking the edits. I will only use it to revert vandalism or bad-faith edits. If I don't get the permission, then that is okay. I will wait for another few months. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

User:Lemondoge

Hello! A while ago, I got a 3-month trial of TPE here with the primary intention of WikiGnoming template-protected modules — making small simplifications to modules to make them more efficient and/or easier to read. My trial expired a while back while I was away, and my interest in editing Wikipedia waned at around the same time, so I didn't re-request it. My interest has partially returned, though, so I would now like to request permanent TPE. I'm confident in my ability to avoid causing any ruckus; I didn't get into any conflict during my trial, and I made sure to test changes and ensure they wouldn't be controversial.

(Note: I'm relatively certain this'll be asked about, so: my Gnomehub I created during my trial does include a few regex searches for things that might be controversial to simplify (although maybe I'm just wildly overestimating the elevation of the "controversial" bar), but those don't serve as statements that simplifying those would never be controversial; those searches might never be used to make such edits, and just lay dormant as an indication of "this pattern of code might not be perfect in an objective sense" to be used if I think simplifying it would be appropriate and non-controversial. Sorry if I'm not making any sense here.) {{Lemondoge|Talk|Contributions}} 19:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)