This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Waterloo Campaign which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Siborne's words "so fine, so splendid, an army as that of Napoleon, one composed almost exclusively of veterans, all men of one nation, entirely devoted to their chief, and most enthusiastic in his cause" represent the view of a British writer within living memory of the Battle of Waterloo. Modern scholars are questioning some of the points:
– The French army had been scraped together so it wasn't composed mostly of veterans
– Most soldiers were French but there were also soldiers from other countries
– The unity of the French people, and by extension the recent recruits, is uncertain
(I am basing this on my memory from recent reading, but it needs verification)
My point is that having only the quote from Siborne is misleading. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Humphrey Tribble: The article is not fixed in stone, it is meant to be edited and improved. If you have sources that contradict Siborne (or support him) then by all means add them. However, the French ranks were swollen by a lot of French veterans, men who had not been available to Napoleon the year before. For example the garrisons all along the North Sea coast to Hamburg, the POWs in Coalition hands (eg the 10 of thousands who were in Russia), and the Peninsular War veterans who had been fighting in the South West of France right up until the armistice. -- PBS (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
