Talk:The South's Finest

A fact from The South's Finest appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that one reviewer of the book The South's Finest called it "chronically and annoyingly" melodramatic?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The South's Finest.

Wikipedia

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Military history: Historiography / North America / United States / American Civil War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Publishing company notability[edit]

In order for a publishing company to be notable, it would usually have to meet WP:NCORP: it's not usually enough to publish notable books, as book reviews rarely discuss the publisher in any depth. I see no evidence that White Mane meets this criteria, and if it's not notable, it shouldn't be redlinked. (t · c) buidhe 03:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buidhe - Redlinks removed, I just kinda linked them assuming White Mane was notable, which after a look, doesn't seem to be true. Tucker's put out a decent amount of work, some of which is fairly widely cited, so he might make a run at WP:NAUTHOR, so I'll leave his redlinks in. I'm new at writing book articles, so these aren't gonna be anywhere near perfect. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that one reviewer of the book The South's Finest called it "chronically and annoyingly" melodramatic? Piston 1994 in the text

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Max Näther
Comment: Can come up with another one upon demand. There's not a whole lot to work with here

Created by Hog Farm (talk). Self-nominated at 04:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

epicgenius (talk) 20:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Philip Thomas Tucker" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Philip Thomas Tucker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 21#Philip Thomas Tucker until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Talk 06:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]