A fact from The Man Who Fell in Love with the Moon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 October 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Another editor objects to my tagging this article as sounding like an advert. Without knowing more about the book I can't reasonably edit it, but I feel the description is overly fulsome without really saying anything substantial or encyclopedic about the book. I was hoping someone wiser than myself could take a crack at it. If anyone has a problem with the tag, by all means remove it and please don't come picking on me for it. Cheers, Her Pegship 22:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was the original author and the article hasn't changed substantially since I wrote it. Surely the article can be expanded but it was created as stub and, instead of narrating the story, I basically copied the original reference. So you are partly right. Yet I am too lazy to improve it right now. I just find inappropiate to drop tags around there and take no responsability in the subsequent discussion. Not even to initiate one. --Sugaar 05:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've retouched it. It's still a stub but probably looks somewhat better. --Sugaar 05:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It just underwent a major expansion, and should be fine now. - Tim1965 (talk) 00:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
