Talk:The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi there, I'm MacMed and I am going to be handling this review. Let's get started :) Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 23:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Links

The links are mostly good, there's just a few issues that I listed below. Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 23:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

• The glitches link in the reception section is a redirect.

• The Vivendi Universal link in the first paragraph of Development is a redirect.

• The first Chronicles of Riddick' link in the same section is a redirect to the film article, though I think you meant to link it to an article about the video game franchise. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong about the target you want.

• The levels link in the Gameplay section is a redirect.

• The enhanced remake link in the lead is a redirect.

Article

• Could you put something about the development in the lead? It summarizes every section but that.

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Everything is good, just waiting on the lead fix.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

• What do I have to fix? GamerPro64 (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I think I fixed the lead. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I will do these tomorrow.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Congrats.