Talk:Thích Nhất Hạnh

Off topic, order of interbeing

The following two paragraphs are off topic for the order of interbeing. Moved here for anyone to re-add elsewhere, maybe in a new section. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Please explain in what sense is this section "off topic"? The section is entitled "Establishing The Order of Interbeing". These paragraphs are about Notable members of the Order of Interbeing - the connection is clear to me. I don't understand what the problem is. -Vellino

Hi, Vellino. I made an attempt to source them and failed. No way could this bio be linked on the main page in recent deaths with two "citations needed" flags. The section is about organizations and bodies that comprise the order, and "establishing" presumes the subject of the action is Thích Nhất Hạnh. Sourcing is missing for these lists of people. They looked like the Trivia sections that we see in some biographies, where people add tidbits without bothering to source them. If you can 1) provide sources and 2) explain what each of these individuals did for the order, then add them back. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi again, Vellino. What would you think of making a new, sourced section of students and followers? I realize that some of the people listed are very well known and it might be good to include them. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Susan - thanks for replying. Thank you for helping to make this page more acceptable for a front-page blurb. I agree that the notables section is weak. I think it was intended - whenever it was begun [not by me, although I added to it] to show the influence that TNH had on already notable people (indeed who became notable because of his influence). But yes, it is poorly documented. The other day I worked on finding a reference for Natalie Goldberg and I thought the fact that she wrote the preface to one of his books would do. Chan Khong is easy to document - I can do that. I know that the JewBu Dharma Teacher Larry Rosenberg has lots of references about TNH's influence on him so that would be easy also. Johana Macy is easy also - I found an interview which make the link clear. Others are less clear.

What I propose to do is to re-write a "Notable Students" or perhaps "Influence on Western Buddhism" section that narrates and properly documents these. I might add bell hooks to that list also. It will have to wait, though. I'm low on time right now. Vellino (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Sounds good, thank you. WP:NORUSH. Christiana Figueres is explained in the Time magazine article. If you need my help please ping or send a note to my talk page. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Notable members of the order of interbeing and disciples of Nhất Hạnh include Skip Ewing , founder of the Nashville Mindfulness Center; Natalie Goldberg, author and teacher ; Chân Không, dharma teacher; Caitriona Reed, dharma teacher and co-founder of Manzanita Village Retreat Center; Larry Rosenberg, dharma teacher; Cheri Maples, police officer and dharma teacher; and Pritam Singh, real estate developer and editor of several of Nhất Hạnh's books.

Other notable students of Nhất Hạnh include Joan Halifax, founder of the Upaya Institute; Albert Low, Zen teacher and author; Joanna Macy , environmentalist and author; Jon Kabat-Zinn, creator of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR); Jack Kornfield, dharma teacher and author; Christiana Figueres, former Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Jim Yong Kim, former president of the World Bank; John Croft, co-creator of Dragon Dreaming; Leila Seth, author and Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court; and Stephanie Kaza, environmentalist.

References

Names for the subject

The article has two areas that cover the various names the subject was known as throughout his lifetime. There are a lot of names, more than I have encountered in any other Wikipedia biography. The first area is a paragraph in the Early life section, and the second area is under an entirely separate heading “Names applied to him”. It would improve readability to combine these sections under a single heading by moving the paragraph out of early life. Cedar777 (talk) 03:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Cedar777, agreed. I'd place the name section right after Early life. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

The sections were combined but I’ll add, this one remains quite complicated. NYT, WaPo, and the book by Taylor list one birth name whereas recent coverage from AP News still lists another. I put a hidden note for editors in the article about this but perhaps it is necessary to list both of the birth names in early life . . . ? It’s a mystery to me how one individual can have two different birth names reported by news agencies. Kind Regards, Cedar777 (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Cedar777 SusanLesch Since I am partly responsible for this issue of names, let me explain. I was given an early draft of the Thich Nhat Hanh biography that is currently on the Plum Village web site. In this draft, but not in the current version on the web site, the document states:

Thích Nhất Hạnh (pronounced Tik - N'yat - Haan), is a religious name (or “Dharma title”) that our teacher has gone by since his early twenties, and the name by which he is known worldwide to millions as a writer, teacher, poet, and peace activist. It is not his only name. As a boy, he received a formal family name (Nguyễn Đình Lang) to register for school, but was known by his nickname (Bé Em). When he first entered the temple he received a spiritual name as an aspirant for the monkhood (Điệu Sung); when he received the Five Precepts and formally became a lay Buddhist he received a Lineage name (Trừng Quang); and when he ordained as a monk he received a Dharma name (Phùng Xuân). When he later needed to register himself legally, he did so with the name Nguyễn Xuân Bảo. He took a new Dharma title (Nhất Hạnh) when he moved to Saigon from Hue in 1949. In the great political turbulence and upheaval of Vietnam in the 1950s and '60s, he used Nhất Hạnh and over a dozen other pen names for his articles and books. For simplicity and ease of reading, this biography refers to Thích Nhất Hạnh simply as Thầy. It is the informal Vietnamese word for “teacher” and the name by which he is known to his students. Vellino (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

References

Largest Monastic Order

I'm intrigued by this statement from the introduction - "He was the founder of the largest monastic order in the West." Does this mean the largest monastic order of any religion or the largest Buddhist order? What exactly does "the West" refer to and would that exclude the monks of his order who are located in East Asia? I think clarification & a citation would be helpful here. Alexandriensis (talk) 22:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Certainly relevant questions you have raised, Alexandriensis. Neither of the cited sources mentioned anything along those lines (Oprah's intro/interview nor the Halifax source). The last paragraph of the lede had a number of problems. I made an effort to resolve some of the matters and have the lede more accuratly reflect the RS content in the body. So many sources mention the MLK Nobel Prize nomination that it was better suited to the lede than the passing mention of veganism w/ only one source. There may be discussion of deep ecology waranting the wiki link but it has also been removed until there is better sourcing identified in the article. There is still a claim in the body (at the end of the Plum Village section) along the lines of the problematic statement that you observed: Plum Village is the largest Buddhist monastery in Europe and America, with over 200 monastics and over 10,000 visitors a year.[citation needed] There must be some mention of this outside of Plum Village itself. It needs at least a primary source, better yet a secondary source. Cedar777 (talk) 23:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

It means "from among the *Buddhist* monastic orders that are not Asian, this one is the largest" - clearly there are non-Buddhist monastic orders that are larger, e.g. the Trappist order that has 3000+ monastics. The Thich Nhat Hahn Foundation 2019 Annual Report states that there are 576 monks and nuns in this order.

This is also documented in the Plum Village Tradition.

"The West" means "where the main monastery[ies] are located not-in-Asia". In the case of the Plum Village Tradition, from among the 10 world-wide monasteries in the Plum Village tradition, the TNH Foundation distributes its support \at the roughly the same rate per monastic across monasteries. Plum Village (France) receives 56%, Deer Park (USA, CA) 20%, Blue Cliff (USA, NY) 12%, Magnolia Grove (USA, MS) 10%. The only monastery (Thai Plum Village) listed in this annual report that is not in either Europe, the USA or Australia receives less than 1% of these revenues.

So "the West" means that the "root" monastery (in this case Plum Village) is in the west and most of the monastics in all the other monasteries are also located in the west. You can't start counting nationalities of monastics, though. I know one monastic that has a African American father (vietnam vet) and a vietnamese mother, and is a dual citizen. Others are Vietnamese Boat people who were naturalized American and many more are European and American.

The only rival Buddhist monastic order in terms of size are the western disciples of the Thai monk Ajahn Chah. The Thai Forest Tradition in the west has monasteries in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand. Counting the monastics in that order is complicated by the fact that, until very recently, they didn't (strictly speaking) have an order of nuns. Women were ordained in that tradition but they were not Bikhunis (ordained with equivalent precepts).

So in the Thai Forest Tradition, there are thousands of monastics but most of them are located in and practice in Thailand. A small fraction of them are located in the west. Amaravati Buddhist Monastery is the largest of these western monasteries and has about 50 resident monastics. Plum Village has about 300.

Vellino (talk) 04:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Vellino, while the annual report, a primary source, is interesting and worth reviewing, there is also this secondary source: Handbook of Ethical Foundations of Mindfulness(edited by Steven Stanley, Ronald E. Purser, Nirbhay N. Singh) which also mentions a similar claim that it makes clear to attribute to the Plum Village website. Cedar777 (talk) 08:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

References

Evalutation of Article - Feedback

After conducting a brief evaluation on this article titled "Thích Nhât Hanh" I have concluded that this information provided is up to date, preceded with an extensive list of references. Although I have concluded that some articles referenced are moderately biased, there are plenty of references that seemingly come from a reliable source. As for the layout and content of this Wikipage, it is well written with a common layout that most biographies have which start with an "early life" section while ending with "death". The content is also detailed and includes a multitude of internal Wikilinks to further support the given information. To my knowledge, all referenced main external links are fully functional except the following: (The following external links result in a "404 error not found" or access denied indicating the webpage has been removed from the databases server. The "archived" external link for the following are accessible.)

Ben, Stocking (22 September 2006). "Tensions rise as police question monk's followers"

"Nomination Process"

Knibbe, Guido (2020). "Meeting Life in Plum Village – Engaging With Precarity and Progress in a Meditation Center"

Duerr, Maia (26 March 2010). "An Introduction to Engaged Buddhism".

Many users have also left suggestions and edits that has contributed to the version history, making it an unbiased Wikipage with purely factual evidence. I would suggest an edit be to made to remove the external links from the Wikipage or be replaced with a existing & functional website. Pattycakekwan888 (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Pronunciation

The only pron I've ever heard in US English is /ˈtɪk ˈnɑːt ˈhɑːn/ TIK NAHT HAHN, which follows the pattern of "foreign A" = /ɑː/ and helps to avoid æ-tensing in the last word. Does anyone use /ˈtɪk ˈnjʌt ˈhʌn/ TIK NYUT HUN in English? Sol505000 (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)