This page was proposed for deletion by KoshVorlon (talk·contribs) on 25 November 2011 with the comment: Not notable except in Wiki It was contested by MuZemike (talk·contribs) on 2011-11-25 with the comment: Garnder was already notable before working for the WMF, and her record while on the WMF only makes for a stronger case for general notability.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Sue Gardner (talk·contribs) / Gardner, Sue This user has not edited the article. This user has declared a connection.
Now, we have in the same place, a complete paragraph about how a banner works:
“
In January 2012 when Wikimedia reached its yearly donations goal, Gardner appeared at the top of every page for a brief time with her photo and a link to a thank you letter which stated that the fundraisers were over. The thank you letter also contains an option to donate, but has a close button that closes the banner for good when clicked.
I think that this article is biased towards trivia, hiding important information. Just my two cents. Regards. emijrp (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The PC citation doesn't even support the material in the article so I removed it. --Malerooster (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted this edit because it did not include an edit summary explaining why a red link was removed. XOttawahitech (talk) 16:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it did include an edit summary, admittedly it was rather terse (deleted cat) - meaning "this cat has been deleted". Why are you insisting on re-adding a cat that has been deleted by consensus, and that you know no longer exists? That's the more important question.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Obi, my bad – I did miss your edit summary, however, I still disagree with your "silent" revesion of my edits. You say there is consensus for the removal of Category:Forbes most powerful women but there were only 6 "Delete" votes in the CfD. Surely it takes more than 6 editors on Wikipedia to form wp:consensus? XOttawahitech (talk) 14:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please stop calling it silent - I provided an edit summary, and I provided a more detailed edit summary the second time. If you disagree with the closure, take it to deletion review. Please stop disrupting this page and wasting time by adding a redlinked, deleted-by-consensus category. What exactly are you trying to prove? And yes, 6 delete votes is more than enough, many entire articles are deleted with fewer than that. I suggest you ask wikiproject feminism/wikiproject women's history people to 1) read WP:EGRS and then 2) show up at CFD and give input. We could always use more people participating in CFD.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 23:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
