Talk:Scientific method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 19, 2008Peer reviewReviewed


"DNA experiments" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect DNA experiments and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 19#DNA experiments until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Science[edit]

Good evening For your assignment activity ( Science)

Answer the following questions in your Science Activity notebook.

Activity 1 Title: Scientific Investigation

  1. . What is Scientific Investigation?
  2. . How important is Scientific Investigation in the empirical nature of science?
  3. . What is Scientific method?
  4. . Enumerate and discuss the steps in scientific method.
  5. . Differentiate Observation from Inference. 2001:4453:243:5000:8035:133B:1320:7B6C (talk) 05:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How to answer this? Dezendenur (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See How to Solve It --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 10:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A section above has more about this. I found a video clip as well. Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 11:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2022[edit]

In practical application, the scientific method provides a methodology whereby only verifiable, reproducible empirical experiments subjected to doubt/skepticism lead to a justifiable approximation of reality <Pelzek> 73.208.238.84 (talk) 06:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wow, as a scientist it always amazes me how today we seem to conveniently leave out "controlled experimentation". We leave it out now because biologists and climate scientists would have to omit half their work.[edit]

Control in experiments is critical for internal validity, which allows you to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables. 204.133.30.36 (talk) 17:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Remember that this is a forum for discussing the content of the article. Do you wish to propose a change? RockMagnetist(talk) 17:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reference correction[edit]

Text "In particular, Paul Feyerabend, in the 1975 first edition of his book Against Method, argued against there being any universal rules of science;[17]" points to incorrect reference. "Against Method" is currently reference [139] Feyerabend, Paul K., Against Method, Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, 1st published, 1975. Reprinted, Verso, London, 1978. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.163.122.18 (talk) 10:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unless you have read the citation given, it is most likely a better secondary source, which is what we prefer. CV9933 (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]