Talk:Puck (magazine)

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Magazines High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contradictions[edit]

Compounding the utter lack of text cites is that the text contradicts itself. While one paragraph claims that "32-page issues" were "typical", the next claims that an issue "consisted of sixteen pages". This article has a long way to go, and Step No. 1 would be getting the facts straight, or at least consistent. No. 2 would be actual fact cites. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punch[edit]

Was it an imitation of the famed magazine Punch?Nitpyck (talk) 07:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

The "Politics and Religion" section in not sourced and the wording reeks of anti-Catholic bias. I nominate it be verified, edited or removed.Thank you LoneWolf1992 (talk) 1:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)