Talk:Process theory

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Science Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of science

Historical fallacy[edit]

I would like an example of a fallacy described in the text. Are there any suitable to the article? 79.220.181.164 (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

This entry would benefit from a reference to people, apart from Whitehead, who are working on "process theoretical" accounts of, say, psychology. What happened after Dewey's "Reflex Arc" paper?

Variance theory[edit]

I tried to find references on the Internet for the so-called Variance theory (mentioned in the article) and the only remotely similar results I got were the following papers on Models in Information Systems: Process-variance models in information security awareness research & Process, Variance, and Systems. The second paper connects at some point this theory with Management Research citing other specialized papers on the matter. Could someone having better knowledge of the corresponding literature add some proper citations to the articles and elaborate on the interdisciplinary connections implied by the article? --Omnipaedista (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Surgence[edit]

Closest definition I could find was for 'surgent'. Although the word is intuitively understood, is it a real word? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.174.67.203 (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]