Talk:Nina Sky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article is about the "bio" of Natalie and Nicole Albino the founders of Nina Sky, and should be kept as such. Nina Sky the band, is a total different subject and if made into an article, the subject should include information about the the other members, appearences, tours, etc. It's the same as if you were to write the "bio" of Ringo Starr and an article of The Beatles, even though related, they are two different subjects. I hope that this puts an end to the constent redirects. Tony the Marine 18:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


The main information should remain at "Nina Sky". Right now, even the information about their career is at "Natalie and Nicole Albino". "Nina Sky" is what they are known as. Most people do not even know their real names. You state that the Nina Sky article should include information on other members, but Natalie and Nicole are the only two members of Nina Sky. Your comparison with Ringo Starr and the Beatles doesn't make sense because Ringo Starr is one of four members of the Beatles who had his own solo career. His biography is different from the other members and his name is well known. Natalie and Nicole have the same exact biography because they are twins. The Beatles is not redirected to a page called " John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr". All other Wikipedia articles about musical groups that consist of siblings are not redirected to the names of the specific members, but remain at the title that represents the name of the group. Examples include Hanson, Les Nubians, K-Ci and JoJo, etc. --Musicpvm 19:52, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote their biographies precisely because they are a pride of Puerto Rico and deserve to be known by their proper names. Their article is a bio and as such should remain in a bio format. While it is true that Nina Sky is the name that they profesionally use and that people may look for information about Nina Sky, the link already made will take them to the bio and "bingo" problem solved. There's no reason to change the bio format and to create a redirect war. Lets not make a big fuzz over this. Tony the Marine 23:45, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know we redirected to the right article. One of Wikipedia's guidelines rules say use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things. As Musicpvm said above, if someone were to look for information about Nina Sky through a search engine, the first thing engin

es look for is the title (what's written on the titlebar of the browser window), which means a search engine will find the WP entry for "Nina Sky" easier than "Natalie and Nicole Albino". One other thought I had is whether Nina Sky may expand in the future, such adding new singers to the group, or replacing them, such as Destiny's Child. That's why the artist's page and the band should be separate. --LBMixPro(Speak on it!) 07:03, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

I completely agree with you Lbmixpro. I still think this page should be at Nina Sky. --Musicpvm 05:04, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Even though my stance is that this is a Bio of the girls as I intended it to be, I also can see were Nina Sky would receive more Goole hits. As a compremise I sujest that the article be moved "as is" to Nina Sky, but that it should only be done by an experienced person who will not overlap the history pages. Tony the Marine 01:57, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Just to make sure I am clear as to what is happening... Do you wish for the histories of the two articles to be swapped, and for Natalie and Nicole Albino to be a redirect to Nina Sky? violet/riga (t) 22:18, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone and done this, adding a new {{merged}} template at the top of this talk page. If you'd like the histories actually merging then let me know, but I don't it is necessary. violet/riga (t) 09:48, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Same song/diferent titles[edit]

The song "Connection" isn't the same as "Touch my Body" a colaboration with Sean Paul?

Touch my body i think, is the name of the "riddim" (used in dancehall music) the name of the collabo is Connection, i have the cd on which the song is featured. In the song the courous repeats "boy when you touch my body,you know you make me feel hot". They however have an album titled, "La conexion"

Date of birth[edit]

My research suggests the twins were born in 1981, not 1986. (See the normally reliable IMDb website here [1]). Would anyone care to disagree ?

Derek R Bullamore 21:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ninaskycover.jpg[edit]

Image:Ninaskycover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Nina Sky"[edit]

the album

Tamara Sky[edit]

Are they related to Tamara Sky, the Playmate from August 2007? Nina Sky was featured in the March 2007 issue of Playboy (Playboy After Hours, Babes of the Month, no nude photos). Is that just a coincidence? They look very similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.136.25 (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

WHAT ABOUT THE BED REMIX?

Certification[edit]

because there's no source, i'll not edit it but wtf it says certified "Wood" lol does that exist

Darius20[edit]

Darius20 16:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overall style[edit]

The style, grammar, and overall content of this article are all over the place. The identity of its first contributor lacks import, but when so first contributed, it was a mess from start to finish. Other Wikipedians and users of wiki should go over the article with a fine-tooth comb and fix its various grammatical mistakes. THIS Wikipedian and wiki user CANNOT trust himself to do so. Parker Gabriel 04:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parker Gabriel (talkcontribs)