Nature is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia.
Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is one of the core set of articles every encyclopedia should have.
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
Surhone, L. M., Timpledon, M. T., & Marseken, S. F. (2010), Ecocomposition: Ecology, place, nature, ecofeminism, environmental ethics, Greta Gaard, Betascript Publishing{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I suggest to add this recent paper published in ""Nature"" in the section "Further reading". It could be great also to refer to its contain in some parts.
Layna Droz, Hsun-Mei Chen, Hung-Tao Chu, Rika Fajrini, Jerry Imbong, Romaric Jannel, Orika Komatsubara et al., « Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of nature in East and South-East Asia », Nature - Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, vol. 9, no 186, 2022 (DOI https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01186-5).
It is about the diversity of conceptualization of nature in East-Asia (in Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Filipino, Tagalog, Cebuano, Lumad, Indonesian, Burmese, Nepali, Khmer, and Mongolian). It includes of course explanations about the history of the idea of nature in Western thought.
It is explained for instance that "the term phusis comes from the Indo-European root *bhū —which primordial meaning is “to grow”".
It also suggest to remain open to the diversity of conceptualization of nature among the world, in particular in East-Asia. The authors emphasize the fact that "To take into consideration the diversity of conceptualizations of nature can lead to better decisions about sustainability and improve the acceptability and efficiency of environmental policies in each local context, as well as internationally." Romaricj (talk) 16:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done If there's more to add to the article from that source, please reopen (and be specific). Thanks! SWinxy (talk) 05:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Are the Phenomena part of Nature or vice versa?[edit]
in Wikidate it is vice versa: nature (Q7860) is part of/instance of phenomenon (Q483247) but in the description it is written like here in en-wiki: "nature = natural, physical, or material world and its phenomena"
so.... what to do ??? Are those just errors in Wikidata and Commons which need to be corrected or is it still an unsolved philosophical question? Regards --W like wikigood to know 05:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not an issue for this article. As for it being 'an unsolved philosophical question', I'm not sure it is even that - just ambiguity resulting from less-than-precisely-defined words. AndyTheGrump (talk) 09:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
.jpg)
Done If there's more to add to the article from that source, please reopen (and be specific). Thanks! SWinxy (talk) 05:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Done