Talk:Mount Kelly School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One better than the other[edit]

The introduction says that Mount Kelly School was created by the merger of two neighboring schools, "one better than the other." Since the person who wrote this did not say which was the better school, and has not explained why it was better, I suggest this piece of editorial be deleted.

Proposed merge[edit]

In accord with suggestions in this Teahouse thread I propose that Kelly College be merged into this article. The article now says that "Mount Kelly was established in June 2014 following the merger of two neighbouring Schools, Kelly College (founded in 1877) and Mount House School (founded in 1881)." Is there a reason to retain a separate article for Kelly College? DES (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that we should keep the Kelly College page to preserve the historical significance of the school, it has specific information as a college that does not translate to the new school. Mount Kelly School is a completely new organisation/business regardless of building and location history. We also need to have the two schools separated to help with google SEO, right now it is causing massive conflicts on returned results in the Knowledge Graph. Red Demon 2015 (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, but the other way round – any useful content from this page should be merged into the pre-existing article Kelly College, which should then be renamed to reflect the name-change. This page was created via AfC by DGG, who I imagine was (understandably!) not aware that we already had a page on the school under a different title, and would otherwise have declined the submission under the quick-fail criterion "already exists". Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Let's just DELETE the 'Kelly College' page and keep 'Mount Kelly School' as it is the most up to date page and the new Schools name. The Kelly College wiki page is still incorrectly being drawn into google search for Mount Kelly. It would, at this stage, be best to delete the Kelly College page.Red Demon 2015 (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ermm, Red Demon 2015, why does Wikipedia care what results a Google search gives? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Having both pages is no longer necessary in Wiki. Is anyone willing to resolve the issue? The current school name is Mount Kelly. With regards to google, accurate information in SERPS is paramount to maintain wiki integrity Red Demon 2015 (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Red Demon 2015, I disagree. Wikipedia simply does not care what results a Google search gives; we're not interested in, and do not tolerate, WP:PROMOTION of any kind. One thing we do pay attention to in order to maintain the integrity of the project is the matter of edits by users with a conflict of interest, and WP:PAID editors in particular. Please read with care the message I have left on your talk page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion to delete the kelly College page is disgraceful, kelly had a proud record as a minor public school for almost 100 years, that remains an historical fact worthy of retention as a separate item on Wikipedia, it will be many years before Mount Kelly equals that record whatever its merits as an educational establishment. If the current management support this idea I can only think they are afraid of the comparison. Signed William Nigel PAIGE, Old Kelleian (1957 to 62) email: wnigelpaige@aol.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.239.47 (talk) 13:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing merge proposal: no merge, given clear objections followed by WP:SILENCE. Klbrain (talk) 22:01, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Regarding the copyright issue, we do have permission to use any text from the Mount Kelly School website. Email sent to permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org Red Demon 2015 (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As that permission has not yet been logged here, the content is being removed. If that permission is accepted, it may be restored. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moonriddengirl, acceptable permission has now been received. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: official sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Conflict of interest[edit]

At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

There are repeated additions to this page referring to the Mount Kelly International School, which are factually incorrect and refer to media speculation. Whilst this media speculation can of course be mentioned, it is being presented as fact and also with bias, not giving balance to the article. Also the article in English is badly worded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.6.229.182 (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I've cut the material down to what is in the sources (SCMP, Standard) and improved the wording. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict-of-interest editing continues[edit]

Someone from the school has been editing the page recently. That is strongly discouraged by our conflict-of-interest guidelines. The usual form of discouragement is immediate reversion of such edits. 62.172.33.147, please read the section headed Conflict of interest above, and confine your contributions to this page, the talk-page of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]