Talk:Moral suasion

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge Jawboning to Moral suasion[edit]

I think the article Jawboning should be merged into Moral suasion. Both articles define both the names as synonyms of each other. Any objections? Quarl ^(talk) 02:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, they are two very distinct terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.143.11 (talk) 12:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also disagree, removing tag. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Jawboning to Moral suasion (2022)[edit]

Jawboning was created in 2004, but hadn't gained much substance a decade later, when a merge was previously proposed, and still hasn't, another decade later - so it seems unlikely that this is going to change in the foreseeable future either. That term and this one are not precisely synonymous, per the comments above, but there is considerable overlap, per the introductory paragraphs of both articles. A merge does seem in order.

- 2A02:560:429B:6600:6811:D63B:9F79:7E23 (talk) 22:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:06, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]