Talk:Jigdo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

popularity[edit]

Do any other distributions or other notable organisations use jigdo? If so I think they might be worth a mention. Admetus 22:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no other entity on earth uses jigdo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petchboo (talkcontribs) 13:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
dats untrue → German compy mag ″ c't ″ used jigdo for their anitvirus CDROM updates in 2004. was a huge ♥ ♥ boost to the project. 91.60.141.13 (talk) 13:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jigdo is also for Fedora core[edit]

Now Jigdo is also supported for Fedora Core 9. reference- [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishek8in (talkcontribs) 07:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Jigdo download support has ended with Fedora 15, see Jigdo History. Michael.Paoli (talk) 13:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about assembling any CDs from random files?[edit]

I would like to see a discussion about people unassociated with an organization use jigdo to enable end users to easily assemble CD or DVD images from files that are not normally assembled that way. For instance, the IBM Redbook series has thousands of book titles in a dozen or so categories. Every published book, draft, white paper, and technote in the series is freely downloadable. However, IBM also sells book collections on CD. I would like to see someone use jigdo to create free ($0), unsanctioned versions of the CD or even DVD images (which don't exist today). The same is true for their research journals, IBM Systems Journal

Also, a key point that this current article misses is the fact that jigdo will compare any previously assembled images against the latest version available to decide if any files already downloaded have not been updated and can therefore be reused. This feature reduces the load on archive servers. That is perfect for my example scenario because older books that are no longer receiving updates will never be downloaded more than once and as newer books have updated versions posted or drafts become final versions, their status is accurately represented on the latest CD or DVD images automatically. Each time a user runs jigdo to refresh a CD or DVD image, only the changed files are downloaded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.163.22 (talk) 13:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully the above point has more-or-less been reasonably addressed by my edit changes. I didn't want to get too detailed. It was rather/quite Debian specific (e.g. .deb files), but Jigdo is more generally useful than that, so I more generally described what it does and typical usage - most notably removing bits about specifically assembling .deb files, as Jigdo is much more general than that. Michael.Paoli (talk) 13:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Numerous updates/cleanup[edit]

I did a large series of changes, most notably:
from: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jigdo&oldid=543721372
through: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jigdo&oldid=543899569
I did a large number of mostly rather to quite small incremental changes.

And
from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jigdo&oldid=546241786
through: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jigdo&oldid=546284914
I did a fairly major overhaul, mostly rearranging, cleaning up, improving accuracy and relative completeness, hopefully generally improving layout and (more-or-less) logical "flow", etc.

My "wish list" for the Jigdo wiki page - hopefully recruit some more experts on the development, use (most notably what various projects do and/or have used Jigdo), and Jigdo history, to round out and complete that information at least some fair bit more. Some references might be difficult or infeasible to obtain, particularly further or more detailed historical data, most notably due to "link rot" - and The Internet Archive didn't capture all the references that may be useful/significant.

Michael.Paoli (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jigdo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jigdo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]