Talk:Hamo (dean of York)

Hamo (dean of York) has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 4, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Catholicism Low‑importance

Hamo (dean of York) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Hamo (dean of York) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Hamo (dean of York) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the dispute over Hamo's appointment as treasurer of York was resolved when his opponent gave him a church instead?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February.

Wikipedia

DYK nom...[edit]

Template:Did you know nominations/Hamo (Dean of York) - Ealdgyth - Talk 16:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

~~book~~
~~T&F article~~

-- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hamo (dean of York)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Serial Number 54129 (talk · contribs) 17:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And, again SN54129 17:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Couple of tricky sentences noted below, but we're not looking for "refreshing, brilliant prose" so they needn't impact the article as a whole.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
For the BHO refs, I'd suggest using the minimal page numbers they give, e.g. pp.40-43 for Archdeacons/East Riding.

C. It contains no original research:
Earwig (couple of nouns only) and no google hits.

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Not applicable.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Usual non-binding suggestions for future advancement...

Out of curiosity, why do you title him Archdeacon of East Riding rather than Archdeacon of the East Riding, our page's title?
- Source: here Ealdgyth (talk) 21:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"he was last attested as holding his last office, dean" -- suggest "final office", per repetition.
Link Husthwaite.
Likewise Precentor.
Do we know why Hamo claimed to have held the Treasureship if he didn't? What's the context?
- No clue. Just that it happened. Yeah, it's odd, but no clue on why. Welcome to the high middle ages, where things don't HAVE to make sense... or be explained. Ealdgyth (talk) 22:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps "this office" instead of the second treasurership.
"an office he held along with the Archdeaconry of East Riding, a combination of offices that had occurred for over 100 years" -- bit complicated this and the next sentence. I'd suggest something like, "an office he held along with the Archdeaconry of East Riding, as the two had been combined for over 100 years"
"Hamo was the final treasurer to hold the East Riding alongside the treasurership, being last-named in the office in 1216"
"Hamo may have been " --He; "but had certainly been appointed by 1 March 18, when his presence is first documented".
Is sacrist a Sacristan?
King John of England -- King John?
It might be tangential, but perhaps a brief explanatory note on why he might have had a son—to the modern Christian, an (officially, anyway...) unheard-of thing!—but back then, less so. Have a look at note #4 where I dealt with something similar (if slightly later).
SN54129 16:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- I think I got all of the above - I replied inline where appropriate. Ealdgyth (talk) 22:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Looks good, passing. SN54129 14:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]