Talk:Gisele Bündchen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGisele Bündchen has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 10, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 13, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Gisele Bündchen thinks that the reason she was audited by the Internal Revenue Service was because of her regular top placing on a Forbes magazine high-earners list?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 20, 2020, and July 20, 2022.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
Gisele Bündchen in 2006
Gisele Bündchen in 2006
  • Reviewed: 60 Hudson Street
  • Comment: I would’ve liked the hook to be about her 37 international Vogue covers in one year (2000), but unfortunately the best source I could find isn’t that good for it. There is a Vogue source about 3 American covers in that year (still an incredible feat which no model has done since) but that doesn’t exactly grab the magnitude of the accomplishments. Other alts can be made too.

Improved to Good Article status by Trillfendi (talk). Self-nominated at 20:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I have verified all three hooks but since I tweaked ALT0 for accuracy, I will need the nominator Trillfendi's approval of the change before proceeding. Gatoclass (talk) 21:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Trillfendi again as I failed to add a new datestamp to the last comment so the ping probably didn't work. Gatoclass (talk) 07:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gatoclass: If someone is audited by the IRS, they would have received an official letter for it, it isn’t speculative. My hook was worded in a way that was neutral toward both parties. ⌚️ (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Trillfendi, the reason I copyedited your hook in the first place was because it had the same ambiguity - but now that you mention it, I agree that my initial copyedit didn't altogether remove it, so I've given it another tweak, please take a look and tell me what you think. Gatoclass (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When referring to reports, the word to use is alleged, allegedly, etc. ⌚️ (talk) 19:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trillfendi, I have struck ALT0 because, as I noted previously, it is ambiguous. When you say "Gisele Bündchen alleges that she was audited by the Internal Revenue Service" it can be misread to mean that she alleges she was audited, rather than the intended meaning, which is that she alleges the audit was done because of her placing on a high earners list. And I'm restoring the hook as I tweaked it as ALT3, because it eliminates the ambiguity. If you don't like that hook, we can run with ALT1 or ALT2 instead, but IMO ALT0 is not viable. Gatoclass (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gatoclass: Eh, alright. If you feel that it’s the best wording then let’s go with it. Trillfendi (talk) 23:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FTX[edit]

The Financial Times (FTX: inside the crypto exchange that ‘accidentally’ lost $8bn, Fri 18 Nov 2022) says that

Bankman-Fried’s fame was reinforced by lavish spending on advertising, from Super Bowl commercials starring Larry David to glossy Vogue magazine ads featuring supermodel Gisele Bündchen.

Assuming true, is this relevant enough about her to be mentionable? JDAWiseman (talk) 20:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: also The Gisele Indicator strikes again, 13 June 2022.

Gisele is 6 feet tall, not 5'11"[edit]

Gisele is 6'0" tall, NOT 5'11", met her many yrs ago. She was wearing flats. She was a tad taller than me, and I'm 5'11" 😁 50.230.254.254 (talk) 21:38, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As nice as that is... we need a reliable source for her height besides an anecdote. Her agency doesn't publish height anymore so we are going with the historical source. Trillfendi (talk) 21:46, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Supermodel[edit]

She is an übermodel a title achieved only by a the brazilian supermodel Gisele Maria1718182 (talk) 21:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2023[edit]

Please change - Spirituality Bündchen believes in astrology, manifestation, and witchcraft. According to Tom Brady, she has used these methods to successfully predict when he would win or lose the Super Bowl.[200] - not acceptable

Please change to Spirituality Bündchen believes in astrology and manifestation. AmberLClapp (talk) 21:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2023[edit]

Request Edit - I am her publicist see new copy

Spirituality - Vanity Fair’s latest issue, - SCite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).</ref>he is one with nature, enjoys astrology, and the occasional tarot card reading. April 2023 Vanity Fair https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2023/03/gisele-bundchen-cover-story

Change from Spirituality Bündchen believes in astrology, manifestation, and witchcraft. According to Tom Brady, she has used these methods to successfully predict when he would win or lose the Super Bowl.[200] AmberLClapp (talk) 14:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC) \[reply]

 Not done: I don't really understand the nature of the request, so I cannot evaluate or implement it at this time. Also, if you have a conflict of interest, you are obliged to declare it in accordance with the relevant policy at WP:COI. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gisele_Bündchen&oldid=1205393347"