Talk:Expressed sequence tag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice[edit]

It seems to me that DNA microarrays are used EVALUATE COMPARATIVE diffences in gene TRANSCRIPTION LEVELS, and not to DETERMINE GENE EXPRESSION. The nuance may be subtle... Also, it would be a good idea to explain from where and when a value of 6 million known ESTs as been approximated.

Another topic of interest : Being derived from mRNAs by retro-transcription, are poly-A primers used or random ones? Does it mean that there can be introns in the sequences (as if the cDNAs were obtained from non-spliced mRNAs) as well as 3' and 5' untranslated regions?

Very good article. Marooned Morlock (talk | contribs) 08:48, 11 May 2006

Patents on EST's[edit]

Does anyone have any thoughts on adding to this article information on patent requests on EST's by various BioTech companies? I do recall a story done on a major TV newsmagazine, possibly 20/20 or 60 Minutes, but it was some time ago and I haven't heard much from the mainstream news recently on this. Google produces a significant number of results for the search +patent +gene, but is there enough referenceable info to warrant a separate article for this topic? Ipso-De-Facto 02:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

???[edit]

If you don't know the technique, you won't understand it by reading this article. --85.179.34.104 (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page needs updating[edit]

There's still a section stating "as of 2006", surely this means the page needs a freshening up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louismaddox (talkcontribs) 05:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Expressed sequence tag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Expressed sequence tag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]