This subject is featured in the Outline of England, which is incomplete and needs further development.
The issue whether England is a country or not has been repeatedly raised.
The outcome of discussion is that England is a country. This has been confirmed in formal mediation with respect to Wales, though the general issues are common amongst England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2007 and 2010.
Text and/or other creative content from England was copied or moved into Outline of England with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists.
DeFacto I was surprised by your rapid removal of the external link to GENUKI which contains a wealth of largely-reliable information and onward links to counties and parishes in great detail and with sources. Tony Holkham(Talk) 10:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
To be specific, I think it falls under WP:ELYES, point no. 3. Tony Holkham(Talk) 10:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tony Holkham, being self-published by volunteers, we cannot be sure how accurate or reliable the data is on that site. It therefore fails WP:EL per WP:LINKSTOAVOID item Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting, at least. -- DeFacto (talk). 12:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@DeFacto - I think GENUKI is acceptable on many counts: (a) it presents data from many sources that can be fact-checked elsewhere; (b) it is rare to find on GENUKI factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, and even more rarely opinion; (c) it is a source of sources, some of which cannot be found elsewhere; (d) it is widely-used as a reference on hundreds of Wikipedia geographical articles. So I don't think it fails WP:EL. Having said that, I don't feel strongly about it being included in EL in this article, but on balance I think it is a helpful, rather than unhelpful, link. Anyone else care to comment? Tony Holkham(Talk) 13:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2023[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Under the 'Government' section in the table on the side, add the fact that the current prime minister is Rishi Sunak. Privatedev11 (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RealAspects (talk) 13:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a 
Not done: See Mutt Lunker's reply. Actualcpscm (talk) 22:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Not done: See Mutt Lunker's reply.