Talk:Embark Veterinary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Moved from Talk:Embark Veterinary, being nominated for CSD G8. — TransporterMan (TALK) 21:48, 3 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Untitled[edit]

These articles seem to satisfy the criteria for notability under WP:NCORP. RoySmith disagrees. Full discussion is at (talk). As a note, I am an employee of Embark, though the original author approached me saying they thought Embark should have a Wikipedia page given notability and then wrote it themselves, and then re-approached me only when it was rejected. I believe the page they wrote does not cross any self-promotion guidelines, and the entire reason RoySmith rejected the page was specifically because he believed it failed the notability criteria, and specifically stated that the articles below do not establish notability even if they were included in the page. If there are other edits that need to be made for other reasons, I'm sure the author would be happy to do so, but first we need to be clear these articles establish notability. Thank you. DogDaysOfSummer1990 (talk · contribs) 19:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/15/11225446/embark-dog-dna-startup-disease-risk-ancestry-boyko-cornell
  2. https://www.americaninno.com/austin/dog-dna-startup-embark-moved-from-austin-to-boston-and-raised-4-5m/
  3. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-06/dog-dna-testing-gets-its-day
  4. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestreptalks/2017/08/03/a-startup-embark-wants-to-be-a-23andme-for-dogs
  5. https://www.genomeweb.com/applied-markets/consumer-startup-embark-veterinary-debut-canine-dna-test
  6. https://slate.com/technology/2018/01/dog-dna-provided-by-owners-has-been-used-for-a-new-kind-of-genomics-study.html
  7. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/07/28/632723832/questions-rise-about-shortcomings-of-dna-tests-for-dogs