Talk:Diffuse element method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Physics / Fluid Dynamics  (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.


I don't believe the proposed diffuse element method (DEM) is similar, rather or otherwise, to smoothed particle hydrodynamics.

I believe moving least squares was used purely for function approximation before the proposal of the DEM. In the same way, a finite element function space on a mesh could be used for function approximation given values at the nodes; this in no way detracts from the intellectual contribution of taking this idea forward to solve ordinary and partial differential equations.

I seem to recall the main genuine criticism of the DEM was exactly that it was *imprecise* with regard to evaluation of derivatives (at least as first conceived).

mikeliuk (talk) 17:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]