Talk:Comisión Femenil Mexicana Nacional

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dmangooo. Peer reviewers: Briannamck8, Footballjz32, Mattyo24.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Comisión Femenil Mexicana Nacional[edit]

I plan to add 5 sources to give a more representative outlook on what La Comisión Femenil Mexicana Nacional stands for. The sources not only explain what the organization stands for but explains how they carry out their mission. The sources explain their current doings in the present day and how they continue to align with their mission statements. The sources are an important addition to the wikipedia article because they present a more representative perspective on the Comisión Femenil Mexicana Nacional as to how they started and how the organization has continued to grow.

Bibliography[edit]

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Dmangooo (talk) 01:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Feedback

I think your proposals for how to improve the page are very good. I think it is important to expand on the role the group has in present society. I think it may also be important to make sure the history presented is accurate and reflects what you find in your sources. I think it may also be helpful to reorganize the list of presidents as it is currently a bit clunky. It might be nice to list the presidents and the years they were in charge rather than every year and who was president for that year. Briannamck8 (talk) 15:10, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Feedback[edit]

I agree that adding what the organization stands for today is a good idea since the article as it is today is more of what they did in the past. I would also recommend changing the formatting of the presidents section since it is a little hard to read. I might also take a look at adding citations to the existing text since there are very few citations, especially in the history section. Mattyo24 (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]