Talk:Civil Air Patrol/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I fixed a few acronym inconsistencies, and tagged an unclear statement.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I left one citation tag for a paragraph that wasn't cited at all.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Really close. In addition to the tags I left, The age of the audio recording concerns me. ON HOLD for up to a week for the minor improvements needed. Jclemens (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I have addressed your concerns. I hope it now fully meets the criteria. —  scetoaux (T|C) 22:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]