This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Charles Darwin is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia.
Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Charles Darwin is part of WikiProject Atheism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up and guide Wikipedia articles relating to atheism. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
Charles Darwin is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Important notice: Some common points of argument are addressed at Wikipedia's Evolution FAQ, which represents the consensus of editors here. Please remember that this page is only for discussing Wikipedia's encyclopedia article about Charles Darwin. If you are interested in discussing or debating evolution itself, you may want to visit talk.origins.
Dave souza this is the rare 2006 FA that has apparently been constantly tended and watched and is still in very good shape. Some notes for the FA sweeps at URFA/2020:
I have adjusted for MOS:SANDWICH throughout; hope my edits are acceptable.
Anonymous (1893). "CHARLES ROBERT DARWIN (Obituary Notice, Friday, April 21, 1882)". Eminent Persons; Biographies reprinted from The Times. III (1882–1886). London and New York: Macmillan and Co & The Times Office. pp. 1–11. Retrieved 12 February 2019 – via Internet Archive. Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFAnonymous1893.
Darwin, Charles (1839). Narrative of the surveying voyages of His Majesty's Ships Adventure and Beagle between the years 1826 and 1836, describing their examination of the southern shores of South America, and the Beagle's circumnavigation of the globe. Journal and remarks. 1832–1836. III. London: Henry Colburn. Archived from the original on 21 July 2012. Retrieved 24 October 2008. Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFDarwin1839.
Darwin, Charles; Wallace, Alfred Russel (1858). "On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection". Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology 3. 3 (9): 46–50. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1858.tb02500.x. Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFDarwinWallace1858.
Darwin, Charles (1868). The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-1-4191-8660-8. Archived from the original on 30 January 2011. Retrieved 1 November 2008. Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFDarwin1868.
There is considerable MOS:OVERLINK, but whether duplicate links are needed is always a judgment call. User:Evad37/duplinks-alt will help identify to evaluate.
I am not sure who else might evaluate this older FA towards marking it "Satisfactory" at WP:URFA/2020, but by putting this note there, we might get that ball rolling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks! The changes for MOS:SANDWICH look good, will check the other points – and review the unused references. . . dave souza, talk 16:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks Dave ... I have too many URFA reviews underway to watchlist them all, so pls ping me when I should revisit. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
SandyGeorgia Apologies for the delay, I've been distracted by a number of other issues, will now get on with checking this over. . . dave souza, talk 11:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, Dave; I will be tied up for a few weeks with my son's wedding, so if I forget to get back to this, please leave a message on my talk page when you're ready for a look. That way, I'll have a permanent reminder to revisit! Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Congrats and best wishes to your family for the nuptials, hope to respond reasonably soon, . . dave souza, talk 15:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've checked the article over, fixing a few minor things and removing overlinks. Basically, it's fine. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will get back to a full re-read in a few weeks, after vacation .. pls ping me if I forget! Meanwhile, others might mark the article "Satisfactory" at WP:URFA/2020A. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could someone make sure that the Influenced and Influences items in the infobox are all cited in the text? Those infobox parameters have a way of getting out of control without citations, and I don't have time this week to check for all ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done. White, Lubbock, and Romanes were all not even mentioned, let alone cited... Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do we really need all the refs in the lead (WP:LEADCITE)? They seem more distracting than helpful—surely all the information is cited below? Aza24 (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agreed. I think some of those are there because of chronic CN tags over the years. But I would agree, they clutter up the lead and some should clearly be removed. — Shibbolethink(♔♕) 23:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Dave souza: Thank you for taking the initiative to keep this vital FA! I have a suggestion regarding the lede. Currently, the first sentence states "[...] best known for his contributions to the science of evolution", but what about "best known for his contributions to evolutionary biology" with a link to evolution? This subfield is by definition the "science of evolution". Wretchskull (alt) (talk) 10:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Wretchskull (alt):, thanks! Looks a good idea, so have implemented it, with credit to you in the edit summary. Hope that suits you, . dave souza, talk 17:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Dave souza: Thank you for your tireless work here! No pressure, but are you willing to continue work here? There are many unsourced sentences. Wretchskull (talk) 09:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Wretchskull: hardly tireless, am a bit worn out but remain glad to try to contribute to this team effort when available. Where sentences are unsourced, will appreciate others adding references, or tagging for citation needed and discussion here. No need to wait for me to make improvements. . . dave souza, talk 15:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Don't have strong feelings about whether the name box should show forenames only (as previously) or full name at christening inc. surname. Have edited it to avoid redirects, and there's no point in linking to the non-notable Mary Eleanor Darwin and Elizabeth Darwin, both are just uninformative redirects. Also, I've abbreviated months as the table adds extra lines and gets very confusing – still happens in some cases, so table needs to be wider but don't know how to fix that. . dave souza, talk 10:43, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Adding images of class/lecture cards purchased by Darwin whilst at the University of Edinburgh[edit]
If this can be attended to, it would be greatly appreciated. UtopiaCaled0nia (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Isabelle Belato Hi Isabelle, is there any possibility that this might be progressed? I'm a volunteer, doing this on behalf of the University of Edinburgh Heritage Collection. If there are any issues, please do not hesitate to let this relative newb know, thanks! UtopiaCaled0nia (talk) 14:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for uploading these class cards, they're an interesting detail of that particular phase in Charles Darwin's education, but they're not a significant feature of Darwin's overall biography which this article tries to summarise as concisely as possible. It's already a very large article, which has been extensively scrutinised as a featured article. Looking at the sub-article, I've tried using these images at the University of Edinburgh section where these lectures are discussed and cited to references. No doubt improvements can be made, particularly to the formatting. . . dave souza, talk 20:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for your response Dave, and I fully understand where you're coming from. I'm still on a learning curve, so all feedback is appreciated. UtopiaCaled0nia (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]