Talk:CATL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 June 2017 by reviewer Eddie891 (talk · contribs).

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

On 10 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Contemporary Amperex Technology to CATL. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 10 March 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 02:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contemporary Amperex Technology → CATL – Per WP:COMMONNAME, by far most news articles refer to the company by its abbreviation, which is also their logo PhotographyEdits (talk) 12:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 17:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the WP:COMMONNAME claim, this is not a technical move. Needs discussion to be on the safe side in case there is a disagreement with this claim. Steel1943 (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943 On basis of what policy is a WP:COMMONNAME claim something that makes it a contested move? I've created probably tens of move requests based on such claims, which were honored without a discussion. PhotographyEdits (talk) 10:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That claim is a matter of opinion, and to me, the WP:COMMONNAME claim wasn't inherently clear from what I saw. But, I'm not opposing or supporting the move: Best case scenario, no one else participates in this discussion, and the page gets moved since it was unopposed, which acts as a "de facto" consensus that moving a page as a "technical move" doesn't provide. Steel1943 (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Advertisement[edit]

This article reads like an advertisement and exhibits a triumphal tone. 216.165.250.230 (talk) 05:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]