Talk:Buddhist meditation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Table[edit]

This is where it went wrong: diff. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Supramundane powers[edit]

I can find references for "siddhis" - but I've never heard of "iddhis". I'm going to find out! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iddhi is a Pali term -- ṛddhi is the Sanskrit term. These are the terms originally used in Buddhism for supernormal powers. In the later period of Buddhism, they were called siddhi, probably under the influence of trends in Hinduism. The use of iddhi in Theravada Buddhism is fairly common, whereas Tibetan Buddhists use the word siddhi, and Mahayana Buddhists in the Far East usually translate the term as "spiritual power", "spiritual penetration", or something like that. Tengu800 08:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Science on the benefits of meditation[edit]

Should we add a section on the science on the benefits of meditation?

There are a lot of studies linked in this breezy concise list of 20+ benefits

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/mindfulness-meditation-benefits-health_n_3016045.html

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdnctx (talkcontribs) 15:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By changing the section heading to Therapeutic Uses of Meditation, it permits more material to be added on the science regarding meditation. There is some editor, however, who is on a soapbox of promoting secular Buddhism, and keeps undoing any effort to improve the section so more science can be presented. Ironically, the Therapeutic Use section is where most secular Buddhists would find comfort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.231.111.137 (talk) 04:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What you continue to do using multiple IPs is spam a non-notable self-authored article from an unreliable source under the guise of adding information. It is reference spam so please stop adding it to multiple articles using the exact same text. Dharmalion76 (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Walking meditation?[edit]

Is walking meditation covered somewhere in this article already? I'm seeking a wikilink to link from the Somatics article. I found this source in case it's helpful: http://www.lionsroar.com/mindful-walking-how-to-do-walking-meditation/. I don't understand Buddhism well enough to add anything to this article; I don't know where it would belong. Hope someone will step in and add this source! And hopefully add a more obvious section about walking meditation. Thanks. --Karinpower (talk) 06:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buddhist meditation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]