Talk:Belgrade

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Belgrade article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 120 days

Belgrade is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 24, 2006.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 19, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
October 7, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
November 6, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
July 31, 2007	Featured article review	Kept
May 28, 2022	Featured article review	Demoted
This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of April 30, 2006.
Current status: Former featured article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities: National capitals C‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the project's national capital taskforce.

Serbia: Belgrade C‑class Top‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as Top-importance).

Greece: Byzantine C‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Wikipedia 1.0: v0.7 C‑class Mid‑importance

This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.Wikipedia 1.0Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial TeamTemplate:WP1.0Version 1.0 articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Accessibility: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> \| b6<!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.

This article is within of subsequent release version of Geography.

Vital articles C‑class(Level 4)

	Belgrade has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Geography. If you can improve it, please do.Vital articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Vital articlesTemplate:Vital articlevital articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

BelgradeSkyline.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lower photos on infobox collage are not clickable[edit]

Could this be addressed? {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 06:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sdkb: It seems like someone removed the whole code for the collage but I added it back. Sorry for replying late Vacant0 (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WP:URFA/2020[edit]

I am reviewing this (old or very old) FA as part of WP:URFA/2020, an effort to determine whether old featured articles still meet the featured article criteria. This article was last reviewed in 2007 and has not been maintained to FA standards; if these issues cannot be corrected, the article should be submitted to WP:FAR.

There is considerable uncited text.
There is considerable text that is dated and appears unchanged since 2007.
There are one-sentence paragraphs.
There is MOS:SANDWICHing and other poor image layout.
There is not a consistent citation style.
There are copyedit needs throughout (as one sample, this is not a sentence: Located only 2 km from Ada Ciganlija.)

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

I'm wondering about the pronunciation? The article cites a source showing three pronunciations but then consigns all but "Bel-grade" to a footnote, but I swear growing up in the US I always heard it "Bel-grahd" until a few years ago, and frankly, I think the growing preponderance of "Bel-grade" might be a bit of "citogenesis." I think all three ought to be in the header, rather than consigned to a footnote? Twin Bird (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]