Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleBelgrade is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 24, 2006.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
September 19, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
October 7, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 6, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
July 31, 2007Featured article reviewKept
May 28, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of April 30, 2006.
Current status: Former featured article

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lower photos on infobox collage are not clickable[edit]

Could this be addressed? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 06:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sdkb: It seems like someone removed the whole code for the collage but I added it back. Sorry for replying late Vacant0 (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am reviewing this (old or very old) FA as part of WP:URFA/2020, an effort to determine whether old featured articles still meet the featured article criteria. This article was last reviewed in 2007 and has not been maintained to FA standards; if these issues cannot be corrected, the article should be submitted to WP:FAR.

  • There is considerable uncited text.
  • There is considerable text that is dated and appears unchanged since 2007.
  • There are one-sentence paragraphs.
  • There is MOS:SANDWICHing and other poor image layout.
  • There is not a consistent citation style.
  • There are copyedit needs throughout (as one sample, this is not a sentence: Located only 2 km from Ada Ciganlija.)

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:48, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I'm wondering about the pronunciation? The article cites a source showing three pronunciations but then consigns all but "Bel-grade" to a footnote, but I swear growing up in the US I always heard it "Bel-grahd" until a few years ago, and frankly, I think the growing preponderance of "Bel-grade" might be a bit of "citogenesis." I think all three ought to be in the header, rather than consigned to a footnote? Twin Bird (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]