Talk:Battle of Chios (1912)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Chios (1912)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Catlemur (talk · contribs) 23:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I will begin this review shortly.--Catlemur (talk) 23:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • The lede should make it clear that the island was captured from the Ottomans either on the first or the second sentence.
    • Done, plus some additions.
  • "In 1822, the attempt by Greek revolutionaries" - Mention that this happened during the Greek War of Independence.
    • Done.
  • "with a garrison comprising the 1st and 3rd Battalions" - comprising of
    • "Comprising" is correct. It is either "composed of" or "comprising".
  • "comprising the 3rd battalion of the 1st Infantry Regiment" - comprising of. You capitalized the word battalion in a previous instance in the same paragraph so I think it should probably be capitalized here as well.
    • Capitalized, as above for the rest.
  • "Patris sailed separately to Mytilene on Lesbos" - Typo
    • Fixed.
  • "the Aipos heights only fell after a night attack by 3rd Battalion/1st Regiment" - by the 3rd Battalion/1st Regiment
    • Done.
  • "Facing determined and spirited Ottoman resistance," - Since determined and spirited are synonyms, one should be enough.
    • Simplified.
  • "while a 200-strong volunteer force was raised at Kardamyla on the northeast, and a volunteer force captured the village of Lithi" - Are those local volunteers that the Greek army armed? Later on there is also mention of Cretan volunteers so it should be specified if it was the Chians or Cretans taking part in the final assault.
    • Good point, clarified.
  • "and a battery from Lesbos" - Since Lesbos is only mentioned as a having a big Ottoman garrison in the Background section, perhaps you should mention that it had already been captured by then.
    • Clarified, both there and earlier.
  • "comprising a force of four battalions" - Maybe change one mention to consisting of for the sake of variety.
    • Did so.
  • Move any strength and casualty figures you have available to the infobox.--Catlemur (talk) 02:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Catlemur, and thanks for taking the time and your suggestions. I think I have taken care of them all. Anything else? Constantine 18:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    --Catlemur (talk) 04:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 02:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Cplakidas (talk). Self-nominated at 17:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @Cplakidas: Good article. Hooks are interesting. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]