Talk:Battle of Caulk's Field

Battle of Caulk's Field has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 6, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Military history: British / European / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sir Peter Parker, 2nd Baronet[edit]

On the article for Sir Peter Parker, 2nd Baronet, it states that he died during this battle of bleeding from the femoral artery. However, on this article, it states that he was killed instantly of a head-shot. Could someone figure out which version of this is correct? Thanks. Lothar_von_Richthofen (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is obviously so balanced/sarcasm[edit]

Assumes British humiliation and that their accounts differ because of this, and are lying for this reason. Complete propaganda (this article). Can't just write they differed and the exact details are unknown for certain parts, have to side with the U.S. account?