Talk:Arden, Warwickshire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


What's wrong with having a page for the Forest of Arden? --Yak 15:56, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)


Although I myself come from Warwickshire it is clear from the description of the area that it isn't just in Warwickshire but in the West Midlands and probably in Worcestershire too. But I hate changing page names so I can't be bothered to change it! Cls14 (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and this is actually a problem in terms of understanding the cultural meaning of the term to those that used it originally. The article itself makes clear it it bigger than Warwickshire and bounded by the Roman Roads - hence it is Worcestershire, Shropshire, Coventry etc.
The tile is misleading and needs changing Acne trumpet (talk) 09:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page saying it's only in Warwickshire is ridiculous and ahistorical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hatsle (talkcontribs) 11:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Just stumbled across this page and realized it has two pictures of the same item with the same caption, just from slightly different angles. does anyone have any opinion on removing one of the two? Thanks, -Vanis314 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanis314 (talkcontribs) 17:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanis314: I agree that the two images of Coughton Cross are redundant, and support removing one of them. I suggest removing the closeup, as that only gives you the text on the plaque, while the wider shot gives you some idea of the actual cross. --Xover (talk) 10:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arden, Warwickshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I think it is too far-fetched to expect people to mistake it for the Forest of Ardennes. But I don't know how to delete that part of the Redirect. Valetude (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]