Talk:Antonio del Pollaiuolo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Antonio del Pollaiuolo/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Incorporates text from a public domain edition of Encyclopedia Britannica. Otherwise scant on sources. Yksin 05:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC) The last name of the artist in the header needs a "u": Pollaiuolo. Sorry, I couldn't figure out how to change this . . . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.33.6.191 (talk) 04:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 04:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 08:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antonio del Pollaiolo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 15:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomb of Pope Sixtus IV, 1493
Tomb of Pope Sixtus IV, 1493

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 13:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Antonio del Pollaiuolo; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Johnbod: Good article. Though, "His main contribution to Florentine painting lay in his analysis of the human body in movement or under conditions of strain, but he is also important for his pioneering interest in landscape. His students might have included Sandro Botticelli." needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done that - I dropped Botticelli as it's rather tenuous. Johnbod (talk) 02:33, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: Good enough now? BorgQueen (talk) 01:51, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Seemingly abandoned by the previous reviewer @Onegreatjoke: so I'm reviewing it. BorgQueen (talk) 01:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]