Talk:Anglian stage

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Anglian stage is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglian interglacial?[edit]

Is this a typo? I've never seen the Anglian cold stage described as the Anglian interglacial. Pterre (talk) 17:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I see it has been corrected - was looking at an old edit. Pterre (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anglian Sea Level map reliability?[edit]

I used this sea level/glaciation map in reference to a discussion of the recent Science article asserting Neanderthals had shipbuilding skills. See summary here. The basic assertion is that since they found Neanderthal style tools in Crete and Crete has never been connected to the mainland by a land bridge in the last million years, the Neanderthals must have used boats to get there.

Eh... right. So it took me 15 minutes to find the article and point to the land bridges in the map. Apparently there's some disagreement between the Paleontologists and Geologists on the extent of the Anglian Maximum since the former think the isolation must have been a million years for the local Pygmy Hippos to pygmyize and for all the other Cretan species to diverge. Actually I think it's more likely they're not even aware of one another's literature. The simple explanation is that some Heidelbergensises wandered over during the Anglian maximum and got stuck, and their tools simply look more Neanderthal than generally is the case.

So of course I get shouted down and told that everything on Wikipedia is garbage and I shouldn't question the wisdom of REAL scientists who would have done their homework before asserting there could be no land bridges. It would be helpful to know the provenance and the confidence in the accuracy of the map. If only to send the Science author a cited copy with "See Land Bridges Here!"

98.225.182.131 (talk) 04:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would not rely on that map. Its provenance has recently been questioned at [1]. It is difficult to find a figure for the drop in sea level during the Anglian, but it must be in the region of 120 metres, so if you check the depth of the channels around Crete you can see whether a land bridge is credible. Is accidental rafting on driftwood possible? This has been suggested for homo floresiensis, but Flores is much closer to its nearest continent than Crete. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having corresponded with Drs. Phil Gibbard and Kurt Lambeck of Cambridge and ANU, I can confirm that the map is inaccurate and should be removed. I have suggested to them that a graduate student specializing in Quartenary Geology (Dr. Gibbard has several) could spend some productive time cleaning up this and other articles on related topics. And so Science marches on. 98.225.182.131 (talk) 04:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sorting this out. I have nominated the map for deletion and removed it from the article. Can you ask your contacts whether they can suggest an accurate map which is in the public domain and could be used instead? Dudley Miles (talk) 21:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There may not BE an authoritative consensus map in the public domain. Like I said, I suggested they nudge someone to revise and they may make a map in that case, but more than that I can't do. 98.225.182.131 (talk) 03:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglian stage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110505053501/http://www.staffs.ac.uk:80/schools/sciences/geography/staff/harrist/quatuk/quateastanglia.htm to http://www.staffs.ac.uk/schools/sciences/geography/staff/harrist/quatuk/quateastanglia.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anglian stage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask Bill Gates or some other rich person to buy for us all the maps and artist's impressions[edit]

We need at least two maps and at least two good and not bad artist's impressions.

Some painters are willing to help, but are either untalented, either metamodernists. We aren't supposed to add abstract art or bad art on an encyclopedia, or we can if we already have 4 clear photos and maps.

Add photos and maps to all the kin pages please!!!

Contact Japan via email and pay some Japanese student. Explain what you want and provide the data. In the northern US, some map makers are good, and charge less. Fuckin' open your pocket for science, or ask a rich person to create better open archives in Wikipedia.