Talk:Ajax (programming)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleAjax (programming) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 14, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Article name[edit]

So, I'm a bit confused as to how this article got lowercased TWICE without any entry in the move log for either move. Or why, it is an acronym after all! —SamB (talk) 22:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

National land code acts 1963 Wincent woo (talk) 03:48, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Shouldn't it be all caps? Rlk89 (talk) 21:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maintenance and rating of JavaScript articles[edit]

Concerning editing and maintaining JavaScript-related articles...

Collaboration...[edit]

If you are interested in collaborating on JavaScript articles or would like to see where you could help, stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript and feel free to add your name to the participants list. Both editors and programmers are welcome.

Where to list JavaScript articles[edit]

We've found over 300 JavaScript-related articles so far. If you come across any others, please add them to that list.

User scripts[edit]

The WikiProject is also taking on the organization of the Wikipedia community's user script support pages. If you are interested in helping to organize information on the user scripts (or are curious about what we are up to), let us know!

If you have need for a user script that does not yet exist, or you have a cool idea for a user script or gadget, you can post it at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. And if you are a JavaScript programmer, that's a great place to find tasks if you are bored.

How to report JavaScript articles in need of attention[edit]

If you come across a JavaScript article desperately in need of editor attention, and it's beyond your ability to handle, you can add it to our list of JavaScript-related articles that need attention.

Rating JavaScript articles[edit]

At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article. Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ajax (programming). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ajax (programming). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Out of Date[edit]

I'm afraid I don't have the skills to edit this page but I fear it's now fairly out of date -- for example, it says that "simple devices (such as smartphones and PDAs) may not support the required technologies", which I think is no longer true, and describes Fetch as "a new native JavaScript API" although it's now at least 5 years old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidoaye (talkcontribs) 10:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agreed, also Ajax has mostly been superseded by the SPA, as shown on its article - maybe that should be mentioned here? Cylinderwheat (talk) 15:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ajax framework[edit]

What is an Ajax framework ? I expected clicking on a link to Ajax framework would tell what an Ajax framework is. However, clicking on that link currently redirects me to this Ajax (programming) article. The word "framework" only occurs once in this article -- in a link in the "See also" section to "List of Ajax frameworks". --DavidCary (talk) 04:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Expansion[edit]

Is it "Asynchronous JavaScript + XML" or "Asynchronous JavaScript and XML"? I've always understood the latter.

But the article by Jesse James Garrett has it as "Asynchronous JavaScript + XML". OTOH, the MDN page has it as "Asynchronous JavaScript and XML", and moreover explicitly indicates the "a" standing for "and". And the MDN page claims that Garrett coined the term, but Garrett's article doesn't claim he did, but merely states that "we at Adaptive Path" have been using the term. So it could be the case that it was originally coined as "and" but it was mistranscribed (possibly via a handwritten note) along the way to Garrett's article. After all, it seems a bit odd not to have the "a" standing for "and".

In any case, we have two sources contradicting each other on the matter. How can we resolve this? — Smjg (talk) 00:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did start as "Asynchronous JavaScript + XML" but quickly became "Asynchronous JavaScript + X". This is all confused as the original APIs mentioned XML, but were used for other purpose.

Given an API to dynamically fetch other bits from Javascript, suddenly broke open an entire world. (Replaced a complex Windows application with an AJAX application around 2007.) pbannister (talk) 02:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]