Talk:Adobe Soundbooth

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adobe Soundbooth article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Replacing Audition[edit]

I didn't realize Audition would still be available however, I looked into it further after reading this and found out it just won't be included in the Production Suite. I can't concisely write about this because I'm not sure how to phrase it and include the current info. As a customer of Adobe's production software, I am quite upset by this change and I think others will be too when it is finally released. So I think it should be included in the article. Ryratt 19:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talked to customer service chat and got this:

Visitor: Is Audition going to be in any suite package?

Clark: I will be glad to help you with that information.

Clark: I'm sorry that Audition is not included in any of our Creative Suites.

Visitor: Will new versions of it have dynamic link?

Clark: Instead of Audition, we have included SoundBooth CS3 in the Creative Suite 3 Production Premium.

Visitor: I need the multi-track tools when I do animation

Clark: Sure, SoundBooth will meet your needs and expectation.

Visitor: Is audition going to be continued to be produced?

Clark: Adobe Audition allows you to record, mix, edit, and master digital audio files with powerful tools that bring flexibility and control to your desktop studio.

Clark: Audition is a standalone product and it is available for $349.

Clark: Are you ready to add the item to your cart?

Visitor: I have Audtion 2.0, is there a newer version?

Clark: SoundBooth is the new version.

Clark: We don't have any upgrade for Audition.

Visitor: Is adobe going to make new versions of audition eventually or is Soundbooth replacing audition?

Clark: SoundBooth have replaced the Audition. We are not going to release any new version for Audition.

Ryratt 19:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adobe's web content disagrees with Clark the customer service rep. At http://www.adobe.com/products/audition/ , they say that version Three of Adobe Audition is available now (October 2008) and they say that soundbooth and audition have different target audiences, implying that both will be maintained and neither replaced. mattbots 10:31 (Pacific), 07 October 2008 —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Corrected mistaken quote[edit]

I've updated the "Criticism" block to remove a misquote attributed to me (as well as the link to the old pre-release forum which no longer appeared to be valid.)

I was misquoted in an attempt to conform to the writer's desire. I did NOT state that reverse was an obvious feature that would be included in Soundbooth CS4 (2.0). I did state that "obvious" features, such as reverse, would be considered for the next version or future versions.

--Diggum (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote (and I quote): "I agree that Reverse would be an obvious feature, but I'm afraid it's not going to make it into version 1.0. I assure you that several of us are pushing to see it in 2.0".

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe Soundbooth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081024120642/http://blogs.adobe.com/insidesound/ to http://blogs.adobe.com/insidesound/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]