Talk:Adam Smith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeAdam Smith was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2008WikiProject peer reviewCollaborated
June 15, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 13, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
March 10, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 13, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 16, 2017.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

Sciences humaines.svg This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2018 and 13 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jaredbawner.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Economic[edit]

The first book on economic written by adam Smith 27.34.104.170 (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please remove FRSA postnominal[edit]

The FRSA postnominal should be removed from the lede and infobox. There is no source for it in the article, and Smith could not have had this postnominal in his lifetime as the organisation only got the Royal title in 1908. (Royal_Society_of_Arts). Moreover, FRSA is not an honour but represents a membership that is open to a wide range of people by paying a subscription. Related discussion here. Historylikeyou (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I undid this removal of the FRSA postnominal. Consensus was not achieved at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Biography.--SouthernNights (talk) 12:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]