Talk:Adam Smith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeAdam Smith was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2008WikiProject peer reviewCollaborated
June 15, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 13, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
March 10, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 13, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 16, 2017.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Please remove FRSA postnominal[edit]

The FRSA postnominal should be removed from the lede and infobox. There is no source for it in the article, and Smith could not have had this postnominal in his lifetime as the organisation only got the Royal title in 1908. (Royal_Society_of_Arts). Moreover, FRSA is not an honour but represents a membership that is open to a wide range of people by paying a subscription. Related discussion here. Historylikeyou (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I undid this removal of the FRSA postnominal. Consensus was not achieved at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Biography.--SouthernNights (talk) 12:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]