Talk:Abaddon's Gate

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

go ahead and delete this[edit]

in fact, feel free to delete the records for the first two books. the first of this trilogy is a stupid Resident Evil clone. i want back the hours of my life I wasted on reading this rubbish --Zimriel (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I discovered that the first book has more than enough cites to merit it being kept and I'm also finding more than enough for the second book. The deletion of this article (Abaddon's Gate) might just be temporary if/when (and it looks to be a matter of when and not if) the book gets coverage later on, and since you're sort of endorsing the deletion I'm thinking that I'm going to redirect this to Leviathan Wakes for right now. That way when this is released and gets the coverage, we have the history already available. I think I'll prep the article beforehand just so it's ready to be un-redirected.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this now is clearly notable enough to merit a page. This is a very popular series, and there are plenty of positive reviews of it (a quick search found a high rank on amazon, as well as a good review on io9, among other things). If no one complains, I'm going to go ahead and revive the article now that the book has been released. Licensedlunacy (talk) 01:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abaddon's Gate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121026152235/http://upcoming4.me:80/news/book-news/james-sa-corey-abaddon-s-gate-cover-art-launch-synopsis-and-release-date-revealed to http://upcoming4.me/news/book-news/james-sa-corey-abaddon-s-gate-cover-art-launch-synopsis-and-release-date-revealed

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:25, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Plot" section comprises character sketches, not a plot synopsis[edit]

Maybe the section should be renamed "Main" or "Primary Characters". Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 21:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)theBaron0530[reply]

Please disregard; on a second, more careful reading, I see that the section is organized to describe those parts of the plot pertaining to the character. Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 21:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)theBaron0530[reply]

Please don't disregard, and see tag added today. The Plot summary section is deficient, and the Characters section is overly descriptive of plot elements. The article is therefore oddly and unhelpfully structured. 174.81.118.154 (talk) 12:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Abaddon as biblical place of destruction?[edit]

Is it worth it to add a reference to the Wikipedia article on Abaddon and its context in Scripture as a place of destruction? I don't know if it passes the original research test, or if it helps to clarify a connotation in the title and the content of the novel. Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)theBaron0530[reply]

It would be nice to include text to explain the title not just a wikilink to Abaddon but I think that would require a good reference. I looked and haven't found a suitable reference yet, but I did find a post from Daniel Abraham where he said the title had been Dandelion Sky before it was changed to Abaddon's Gate (and that it was not related to Warhammer 40,000). -- 109.79.174.193 (talk) 02:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]