Talk:ARP 2600

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

I moved the following section from the article because of the self reference in the "Version III" and "Version IV" sections. As I lack the knowledge to fill in the missing information I could not remove the self reference without leaving a partial list, so I moved the whole thing here until someone can finish it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osmodiar (talkcontribs) 16:17, 8 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Version I, the "Blue Marvin" or "Blue Meanie"[edit]

File:Arp2600blue.jpg
The "Blue Meanie"
  • Officially named the 2600. Commonly called the "Blue Meanie".
  • Produced in 1970.
  • It came in a blue aluminum case. Being their first model, it was prone to breakdowns and was highly unreliable. Due to their all aluminum design, they were very hard to service.
  • The Blue Meanie folds like a breifcase, for easy, portable, design. The carrying bar turns out to be more of a hindernce to many players though. Keyboard was modular, but one was sold with it.
  • Between 50-100 "Blue Meanies" were built in a garage before the ARP plant was open.

The early 2600s were built in a small facility on Kenneth Street in Newton Highlands, NOT a garage. Marvin Cohen was NOT an engineer at ARP. He was the CFO and later the president.

Version II, the "Grey Meanie"[edit]

File:2600gm.jpg
The rare and coveted, "Grey Meanie"
  • Appeared in 1971.
  • Factory produced.
  • First version of ARP that denoted the rectangular 'ARP' logo on its right speaker grille.
  • Only a few "Grey Meanies" (at least two) exist. Apparently, around 10 were made. They are the same design as the other 2600's internaly, they just have a grey/black color scheme on the exterior casing.
  • The keyboard on the Grey Meanie came with a handle as on the synthesizer, for more portablilty.
  • One of the extremly rare Grey Meanies is now kept at the London Synth Museum.
  • The original Model 4012 filter used in the Grey and Blue meanies was a copy of Moog's patented ladder-filter design. This led to a law-suit between Moog and ARP which forced ARP to design their own filter.

Version III[edit]

More info to come! ;)

Version IV[edit]

More info to come! ;)

Infamous Moog filter?![edit]

I always thought the Moog ladder was one of the more highly regarded music filters in history. I don't see how "infamous" is the right word to describe it. Shouldn't it be "famous ladder filter"? 70.112.164.209 03:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube links[edit]

174.51.99.65 (talk) 07:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

add Rob Coleman as best performer on an arp2600 ever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.85.178.79 (talk) 15:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ARP 2600. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

list of "notable" users[edit]

sigh.

a list of professional keyboard players who *haven't* used a 2600 at some point in their careers would take up less room.

votes for drastic thinning?

duncanrmi (talk) 13:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve cleaned this up a lot. If someone wants to list a player as one who has used the 2600, they need to find a reliable source showing the artist in question using a 2600. Yes, even stuff like Vintage Synth Explorer is OK; it just has to be a reliable source (I’ll even accept stuff like them saying, on their own webpage, “I use a 2600”, if the artist is otherwise notable) Samboy (talk) 14:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Samboy. Apologies, as I was working on an article edit offline when you cleaned up the list, so I inadvertently copied the older (longer) list back into the article when I saved my edit. Thank you for restoring your shorter list. If I come across other mentions of notable 2600 users that can be properly referenced, then I will expand the list accordingly. synthfiend (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]