Talk:43 Things

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Nice Ad[edit]

Really. This is one of the best advertisements for a website I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.197.110 (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "Amazon.com has not confirmed whether they are porting their whole website to use the Ruby programming language or if they actually let small companies they invest in make their own decisions." belongs in tabloid journalism, not an encyclopedia.

Please promote your programming language du jour elsewhere. huh!

Amazon.com has also not confirmed whether they are planning to murder all their employees and replace them with oompa loompas, but I don't feel that is notable either. Nice —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glamourpup (talk • contribs) 15:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Salon.com CEO resignation[edit]

The article seems to suggest that the Mieszkowski debacle may have had something to do with David Talbot's resignation as CEO.

The fact that Talbot remains as the chair of Salon's corporate board; that the resignation from CEO position happened on the day Salon posted profit for the first time; and that a permanent successor was named immediately make this hypothesis very unconvincing.[1]

Controversy?[edit]

This whole controversy section is idiotic. This doesn't seem like the sort of factual information that belongs in an encyclopedia.

The real beauty of Wikipedia is the massive wealth of knowledge available for those willing to take the time to actually look. My search for knowledge, answers and social contacts have been increased so much with the great care and hard work of the authors of these very important articles. People like yourself who take the time to add so many helpful links and explain things so clearly are a blessing. I have felt like I have just found a library that has been hidden to me for so long. Thank you sir for all your efforts and valuable information.

Vegas dragons 12:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC) vegas_dragons[reply]

List of social networking websites on AfD[edit]

List of social networking websites is currently an AfD candidate. You are invited to partake in this discussion. Czj 17:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conspiracy theories[edit]

I removed this category from the article. Its inclusion here makes no sense to me whatsoever, after reading the current article. But I thought I should make a note of it since it looks like it's been here a long time. Grand master ka 04:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of social networking websites on AfD[edit]

List of social networking websites is currently a candidate for deletion. You are invited to partake in the discussion.--Crossmr 14:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In need of references[edit]

The page currently has no references. I have found the URL to the official blog stating that they have reached 1 million members in April 2007 (http://blog.robotcoop.com/2007/04/27/43-things-has-gone-platinum/). The blog also confirms a few other statements found in the Wikipedia entry (although the "43 Things Launches!" entry is dated one day before what the article says. Puceron (talk) 02:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@Puceron: I agree. This statement needs an accurate source: "As of September 30th, 2014, the 43 Things website contains an announcement advising users that it will go offline on New Years Day, 2015." I believe their announcement goes even before 30 Sept 14. This link has a user inquiring about their announcement as far back as 22 May 14. http://www.43things.com/entries/view/6484211 --Zyvzyva (talk) 21:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revival Section[edit]

Earlier today, I found out 43 Things is coming back on January 1, 2017. If there are reliable sources to support this claim, then this section may be added to the article.--OfficerAPC 02:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 43 Things. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100124153336/http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=9 to http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]